The Trump Impeachment Thread

Quote: ams288

lol.... so desperate.

It's the opposite of desperate. If you
go into court with a worthless
frivolous lawsuit, which is what
the Dems are doing, the judge
will dismiss it immediately.
That's what needs to be done
here so this ridiculous stunt
is never pulled again.

GOP Raises More Than Twice as Much as Democrats
AND
Trump approval up 6 points since launch of impeachment inquiry: Gallup

lol!

According to the libbies, I thought Trump was toast? I thought the whole country was going to turn against him? I thought he was basically going to have a 0% approval rating?? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Just goes to show you how out of touch those crazy libbies really are lol!

The tally is in and 30% or more of
Twitter Libbies thought Trump
being impeached meant he's
gone after the first of the year,
they finally got rid of him. There
were students reporting that
teachers came to school on
Thursday jubilant and giddy that
Trump was gone. And students
had to break the sad news that
not only was he still there, Nancy
was hiding the articles of
impeachment from the Senate.

I wonder how many thought
Hillary would now be sworn in,
you just know it was half of
them.

Quote: terapined

Quote: Tripdufan

What? Oh come on. This makes perfect sense!

"Hey I know your country is corrupt. Can you do me a favor and investigate corruption?"

To quote Donald Trump, "How stupid are the people of Iowa America?"

It really boggles my mind how trump excusers really believe he wants to fight corruption in Ukraine
No doubt they would all line up at a chance to buy the Brooklyn Bridge

Why not buy the Brooklyn Bridge? I lived walking distance in Medical School. It is quite attractive.

To answer both you and Rx, if there was actual evidence, the Democrats would have presented it already (unless waiting for a Senate bombshell). I don't actually believe that fighting Ukrainian corruption was a Trump priority, but when he found out AN EX VICE PRESIDENT was intricately involved it became one. You can make your own conclusion, as both of you clearly already have done, but why are you afraid if this evidence is so clear that 63+ million Americans won't be able to see it? Most people had their minds made up BEFORE the impeachment inquiry..... Why have more moved AGAINST impeachment once the "evidence' was presented? If the case was made, wouldn't you expect MORE people to have favored the impeachment AFTER the so called evidence was presented? Why would Pelosi have EVER said that impeachment needs to be bipartisan? If I've asked too many questions, just answer the last one.....

If you think that the Democrats impeached him for any reason other than to put on a show that they know will go no where towards removing him, I can re-sell you that bridge I just bought....

Quote: Evenbob

This is interesting. It's being reported that the
Senate can send the articles of impeachment
to the Supreme Court for a ruling on whether
or not they meet the constitutional requirement
of high crimes and misdemeanors. If they do not,
and everybody knows they don't, the Supreme
Court will rule them invalid and the impeachment
will be nullified. Because Nancy Pelosi is trying to
extort the Senate into having a trial were there
are no crimes.

This would be interesting. I tend to agree with you. I have NO IDEA how the court would rule. As much as ousting a duly elected President is a BIG DEAL, nullifying a vote of the majority of the House is a BIG DEAL. I could see the Supremes saying something like 'the Senate will be the arbiter of whether they are high crimes and misdemeanors' or something like that.

Heard this example today which was written after the Nixon impeachment.

The president could move to Saudi Arabia so he could have 4 wives and do work by wire service.

He would be impeached though that is not illegal.

So EB repeating the Supreme Court would rule an impeachment void for no crime is false even if that were the case.

Quote: SOOPOO

This would be interesting. I tend to agree with you. I have NO IDEA how the court would rule

Sure you do. There is not a single crime
mentioned in the articles, certainly not
one that falls under high crimes or high
misdemeanors. The House can't find a
crime so they now they want the Senate
to find one.

The Senate should schedule their vote for Monday, February 3,2020 the same day as the Iowa Caucuses. They were given this wonderful gift for fund raising and to distract people from the Democratic primary, so they should maximize it's potential.

Quote: Pacomartin

The Senate should schedule their vote for Monday, February 3,2020 the same day as the Iowa Caucuses. They were given this wonderful gift for fund raising and to distract people from the Democratic primary, so they should maximize it's potential.

Can’t schedule the vote if Pelosi hasn’t sent over the articles yet, can they? 😏