The Trump Impeachment Thread
December 19th, 2019 at 7:03:35 PM permalink | |
ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 12532 |
Who cares about those? What kind of petty imbecile attacks a dead war hero? Oh yeah, the obese orange moron you worship... “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
December 19th, 2019 at 7:11:09 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18762 |
Gee, most of the Trump lovers here would be wanting to throw someone in jail with as much evidence if it concerned a crime against them or their property. -6 people would tell you they thought the accused was talking about committing the crime. (government employees testifying) -the accused alibi has no evidence of even existing. (no evidence of Trump caring about corruption up to that point) -the alibi has changed several times. (Trump first says no quid pro quo, then Mulvaney says quid pro quo get used to it, then Trump yes it did happen but is okay. WHICH is it? - the accused is known for lots of lying. (do people really believe otherwise? Sorry, if so, can't help you see actual facts) - the accused has a record of engaging in frauds. (Trump housing, Trump college, Trump charity) Yet, if it was your own property the crime was against, you don't believe it could be the guy? C'mon. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
December 19th, 2019 at 8:15:26 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Jeff sessions was a senator during the Clinton Senate trial. He says the first thing you do is you take the articles of impeachment, and you break them down word by word to find out exactly where the crimes are that the president is being tried for. With Clinton it was easy, there were multiple obvious crimes. Pelosi does not want her impeachment articles anywhere near the Senate because it will take them 5 minutes to figure out there are no crimes to try anybody on. He says the Democrats think they've accomplished enough just impeaching the president, when they've actually accomplished nothing. The definition of ipeachment is literally "the action of calling into question the integrity or validity of something." It has nothing to do with removal, prosecution, or punishment of any kind. It's just the opinion of the house. It's up to the Senate to examine the crimes and mete out the punishment. There are no crimes to examine, the whole thing is a joke. Somebody said Pelosi has pulled the pin on a hand grenade when she started all this and she's afraid when she lets go of it it's going to explode in your face. That's pretty accurate. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 19th, 2019 at 9:11:51 PM permalink | |
aceofspades Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 83 Posts: 2019 | Just a reminder -- POTUS Trump has not been officially Impeached www.bloomberg.com/amp/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-delay-could-be-serious-problem-for-democrats |
December 19th, 2019 at 9:24:35 PM permalink | |
rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18762 | https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/december-web-only/trump-should-be-removed-from-office.html More at the link.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
December 19th, 2019 at 9:56:34 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
I was not aware till today what a big nothing burger House impeachment really is. It's just the opinion of majority of the house that a crime has been committed by the president. It doesn't prove anything, it's up to the Senate to prove the crimes and to punish for the crimes. House impeachment is a meaningless document before it goes to the Senate. It's just like a criminal indictment is meaningless until it's a given to the prosecutor. In the house impeachment is not even a criminal indictment, it's just an opinion. They are already saying that if the Republicans take the house back next year they will expunge this impeachment from the Congressional Record. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 20th, 2019 at 12:09:04 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | Remember Noah Feldman, the Harvard law professor who testified? https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-causing-a-blue-christmas-let-s-get-real If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 20th, 2019 at 9:26:37 AM permalink | |
SOOPOO Member since: Feb 19, 2014 Threads: 22 Posts: 4175 |
You miss the point.... It's not about what I BELIEVE, it's about what can be PROVEN! And I can't believe you actually typed this "(no evidence of Trump caring about corruption up to that point)". Do you actually believe that is relevant? Since this corruption is egregious and involves an ex Vice President, maybe it rose to the level of him caring? Once again, you are trying to oust a duly elected President based on him now caring about corruption while before he just wasn't on the record as making it a talking point? The accused is known for lots of lying? Are you aware Pelosi just said that the impeachment process was fair to the President and the minority (Republicans). So now Pelosi is known for lying, obviously. Use that to impeach her if she was impeachable? Should Obama have been impeached on 'you can keep your doctor'? NO! Remind me of which fraud Trump has been convicted of? And which occurred during his Presidency? You do realize if this was a criminal trial the prosecutor bringing this case would be laughed out of court? As it will be laughed out of the Senate. Your post is typical. You are someone who just hates/dislikes/despises Trump, You will see him being a bad guy, and damn the evidence, and conclude he is guilty. I agree with you and can list a plethora of things that Trump has done that are questionable at best. But NONE of them rise to the level of removing him from office, other than via the next election. Democrats, spend your time and energy showing the nation the value of your candidate; we all are aware of Trump and his strengths and weaknesses. |
December 20th, 2019 at 9:46:40 AM permalink | |
Tripdufan Member since: Oct 3, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 710 |
Now that you agree that what Trump has been alleged to have done IS in fact impeachable, we can move on. I'm assuming that you are DEMANDING that Mulvaney, Bolton, Pompeo, and Giuliana all testify, correct? Also, you do realize that Trump has not turned over ONE document that's been requested? Think about that for just a second. Trump says he didn't do this (although he's on camera admitting to it), why do YOU think Trump is withholding EVERY document and EVERY witness from providing the EXCULPATORY evidence that would clear him? You talk about the prosecutor "being laughed out of court" as if that means jack s**t. The prosecutor, in a criminal case, would have access to all of that evidence. Trump is blocking it. And if the reasons he's blocking it aren't obvious to ya (because he's guilty, duh), then you are more supporting of this man than you let off. |
December 20th, 2019 at 9:53:04 AM permalink | |
Tripdufan Member since: Oct 3, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 710 |
My question wasn't directed to you. I'm not interested what folks in the basket think. I already know. You also didn't answer with a simple yes or no. The aid was delivered on the day he got caught lol. In your world where Trump is a good guy, that's just a coincidence. In the real world, that's called, EVIDENCE he's guilty. But to answer your question, NO. |