The Trump Impeachment Thread

Quote: ams288

Not according to people who work in the WH. They say it ruined their whole day.

LOLOL! There is ALWAYS ALWAYS
somebody in the WH that will
say just Trump breathing has
ruined their day. So what. We
love when Trump does his Tweets
cause it triggers the crap out of
Libbies.

Have any righties been able to explain why the WH’s readout of Donny’s April call with the Ukrainian Prez said they discussed combatting corruption, but the transcript Donny released that was read by Nunes yesterday had not one mention of “corruption?”

Seems like kind of a big tell, doesn’t it?

Quote: SOOPOO

I don't think it was a nothing burger.

Having her testify at an impeachment inquiry is an ABSOLUTE DISGRACE! She knew nothing directly about any EVIDENCE against Trump!

Actually, the president declares so much as fictional events, it helps just to have people confirming actions actually took place by other people.

The testimony about the phone call wasn't even mentioned in Sondland's original testimony until we had these witnesses come forward to speak about it. Now it's going be brought up when Sondland testifies again.

If you're going to announce the Democrats disgraceful, please remember the President won't let primary witnesses testify.

Why aren't you outraged about that?

Quote: rxwine

please remember the President won't let primary witnesses testify.
Why aren't you outraged about that?

Because letting them testify would
be ridiculous. They would be open
to every kind of perjury trap, and
there are a ton of them. Only a
fool of a lawyer would let them
testify. All they have to do is find
one thing a person said or wrote
years ago, and have them not
remember it correctly now, and
you've got them lying under oath.

I find it amusing that the democrats recently had to change their impeachment narrative from "quid pro quo" to "bribery". They did it because they held "focus groups" which determined that their constituents were too stupid to understand "quid pro quo". LOL

Quote: Evenbob

Because letting them testify would
be ridiculous. They would be open
to every kind of perjury trap, and
there are a ton of them. Only a
fool of a lawyer would let them
testify. All they have to do is find
one thing a person said or wrote
years ago, and have them not
remember it correctly now, and
you've got them lying under oath.

Prosecutors can offer witnesses immunity in exchange for their testimony.

And witnesses can take the 5th on self incriminating info.

Quote: rxwine

Prosecutors can offer witnesses immunity in exchange for their testimony.

What's the crime they're testifying
about? Tell me.

Quote: rxwine

And witnesses can take the 5th on self incriminating info.

Yeah, that usually goes over well. lol
And you can still easily commit
perjury, unless you refuse to answer
any questions at all, and then what's
the point of doing it.

Quote: rxwine

And witnesses can take the 5th on self incriminating info.

Any time you get people that
close to a president, he will
always claim executive privilege.
Clinton and Bush did it 20 times.
Obama did it over Fast and Furious.