Is Satan Real
January 30th, 2015 at 12:09:57 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Depending on your net worth you might have inadvertently made a big donation to the Church, thank you in advance.
Morality and marriage are both natural to us as human beings. Christians just healed, honed, helped, and heightened our understanding of these natural gifts.
Like an good scientist he looked at the evidence and went where it lead him. It is pretty much a given now, after more discoveries and confirmations, that the universe began to exist. There might be a few atheist holdouts worried about what such a scientific fact might do to bolster an argument for God. I feel sad for them, like I do the creationists, they have an ideology that won't let them freely follow the truth. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 30th, 2015 at 12:13:11 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Sustained life changing relationships are not made by any material product or politician. There is a flash in the pan and then they are gone. The same item or person doesn't sustain a following of immense importance for more than a few minutes much less a few millennium. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 30th, 2015 at 12:36:06 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
This is the least convincing argument you could make, come up with a better one. Or shall we go back in history and find all the the other false things lots of people believed too.. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 30th, 2015 at 12:39:12 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
You act like every member of the Church has a burning for the religion, a rock solid belief in it. Not hardly, most as lukewarm at best, just along for the ride because they're lazy, or don't know any better. Or both. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 30th, 2015 at 12:44:23 PM permalink | |
Face Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 61 Posts: 3941 |
And billions believe(d) in Muhammed. And Vishnu. And Buddha. And billions more believe(d) in nothing at all. And every one of them thinks they're right. Maybe they all are. Be bold and risk defeat, or be cautious and encourage it. |
January 30th, 2015 at 12:45:45 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
They are all partly right. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 30th, 2015 at 12:57:28 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
To them, in the reality they're creating at that moment, they're right. If you have a strong enough belief, all religions are right. But the universe is bigger and more complicated than could ever be explained is in a religion. Or ever be explained at all. I'm betting if we ever have contact with an alien intelligence, they won't have any more of a clue than we do. They'll have some weirdo belief system and think all of ours are whacko. Which of course they are.. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 30th, 2015 at 1:48:12 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
That'll be the day.
As I said, the essence of apologia is to claim it all and blow it out of proportion.
That depends: are you privy to more information than the whole of the cosmological and astrophysical communities have access to? Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
January 30th, 2015 at 1:51:00 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Have you seen a TV commercial or not? The principle is the same. The difference is time and relevance. The tools used are the same. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
February 3rd, 2015 at 7:32:58 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
I can't believe no one has called me on that last parenthetical. Augustus and Jesus were pretty much contemporaries, or nearly so. The practice of deifying Roman Emperors wasn't entrenched until much, much, much later (and it didn't help the next two emperors were so despised one had his body desecrated after his death and the next one was killed by his guards). This naturally brings up the question: whose practices were being imitated, if not the Romans? Well, there are a number of possibilities. Other influential civilizations of the era regarded their living kings as living gods. The Egyptians, the Persians and others. In particular the Persians used a title for their monarch which coincidentally matches one used in the New testament: King of Kings. Then, too, the most admired and remembered man who ever lived, up to that time, Alexander of Macedon, at one time adopted the Eastern practice of living deification. Surely the early Christians would have their savior be no less. A common general outrank the messiah? Never! Ergo the deification of Jesus, plus the need for a holy trinity to make it fit with notions in the Old Testament. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |