Original Sin?
August 24th, 2015 at 9:44:34 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | Even more Good News from Neurologica. http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/does-science-prove-god/ It's partly an argument I constantly make. In fact, I'd claim I've made it better, but then I had the luxury of multiple postings. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
October 12th, 2015 at 9:38:10 AM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | More Good News to spread: http://www.realclearscience.com/journal_club/2015/10/12/shroud_of_turin_dna_comes_from_all_over_world.html You can end your bondage to an object. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
October 12th, 2015 at 12:31:31 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 | I love the shroud, it has a pic of Jesus the Giant on it. A 6' Jesus that would have towered over his disciples. Goliath was only 6' 9" and would barely make a good NBA player. Yet he was so tall he was called a giant. If Jesus was really 6' tall, as the man on the shroud is, it would surely have been mentioned somewhere. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 12th, 2015 at 12:49:12 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | The Shroud shrouded in mystery. I usually don't read Nareed's posts but I do like that line from the end of the article. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 12th, 2015 at 2:03:48 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
The real mystery is why a 6' Jesus was never mentioned. You have two conclusions. Jesus was not 6' tall. The shroud is a fake. Duh. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 12th, 2015 at 6:54:45 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | Really only those two conclusions? Maybe the interpretation of the shroud's image could be off? “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
October 12th, 2015 at 8:35:11 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
We already went down that road. An expert on these types of images said the figure is 6' tall. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 13th, 2015 at 5:26:29 AM permalink | |
Dalex64 Member since: Mar 8, 2014 Threads: 3 Posts: 3687 | Maybe it got wet and stretched. "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan |
October 21st, 2015 at 1:55:29 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | I'm listening to a lecture series on military history. Surprisingly, the lecturer delves deeply into the tangible origins of beliefs, customs and practices of various ancient civilizations. In particular he brings up religious beliefs. According to his analysis, it seems likely Yahweh, or Jehovah, was derived by the Israelites from an Assyrian war deity. This would explain quite a lot. You'd expect a war god to be bloodthirsty and prone to use excessive force. How best to defeat an enemy, after all? But he doesn't stop there. He makes a good, if brief, case that latter iterations of Jehovah as well as the appearance of Satan, reflect aspects of the Zoroastrian faith as practiced by the Persians, with Jehovah incorporating aspects of the good god, Ahura Mazda, and Satan of the bad god, Ariman. Further, the Persians believed the world would end when the forces of Ariman faced off against those of Ahura Mazda. The latter would be led by a human savior, who'd be born from a virgin. As ancient peoples go, the Assyrians stand out for cruelty. One can imagine what their war god was like. And that ultimately is what Christians, Jews and maybe even Muslims claim as a source of morality. I'll admit to a great, big heap of confirmation bias on my part. But it's the one thing I've learned so far that even begins to make sense of Western religions, and how they've been moderated by other institutions over time. Now the progression of the decline of the Roman Empire to Dark Ages to Renaissance to Enlightenment to the Present begins to make logical sense. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
October 21st, 2015 at 5:59:08 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | In re my last post, it boils down to the following: The dominant Western religion is a philosophical derivation of the war god of a people particularly cruel in warfare, but adapted to every day life. It is somewhat moderated by the latter adoption of two Zoroastrian deities, then further modified by the ideas born of 1) the old war-god period prophecies and 2) Either Jesus or his followers as set down in the New Testament canon. But throughout all this, the moral core of the whole thing remains the old war deity, cruel, demanding, vengeful and bloodthirsty. The attempt to change him to a loving god fails completely. You get a "loving" god for whom too many morally neutral or inconsequential actions are sins which deserve harsh punishment, or at the very least a great deal of atonement and penitence. Not to mention his followers (supplicants?) keep finding ways to assert their own cruelty and vengefulness through him as a sacred act. No wonder this theology regards brutal, bloody murder as an act of "love" and "redemption." And it's humanity that's supposed to be "broken"? If this sorry, pell-mell agglomeration of primitive superstitions and really bad ideas is real (HA!), he should be begging us for forgiveness. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |