Original Sin?
| May 10th, 2015 at 3:55:00 AM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | Isn't that convenient, when you don't want to talk about something you call it a discussion about semantics. Maybe you could enlighten me about your definition of evidence and what real hardcore evidence looks like? “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| May 10th, 2015 at 12:56:51 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
The most obvious is prayer. Study after study after study has been done on the effectiveness of prayer on the dying. Some involved thousands of patients and cost millions. The outcome is always the same, the ones who were prayed for died at the same rate as those who weren't prayed for. If god were real, we would see a positive influence on those prayed for. Of course religious people laugh and rationalize the outcomes of these studies, just like they twist everything else to fit their view of reality. There are a few thousand obscure religions on the planet, some worshiping some very strange gods. In order to pick your god, you must first reject all the other gods. I like what Stephen F. Roberts said when talking to a Christian friend, he sums it up rather nicely. "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." And you FrG, will understand why I am an atheist when you realize why you reject all other gods besides yours. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| May 10th, 2015 at 4:34:41 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
There is a huge difference that I don't think you or Stephen Roberts realize. Atheism is the outright rejection of all religion and gods. This would not necessarily be the position of Christians, especially in regards to religions and concepts of God previous to the Revelation of Jesus Christ. Nareed and I have gone back and forth about this and Vatican II expresses the idea that there are sparks of truth present in many religions that lead eventually to the one true God. Surely Christians see their foundations is the Jewish Religion, so there is not a rejection there. Even the thirst for and quest to understand a higher power than humanity is clearly present in the pagan, eastern, and even prehistoric religions. True atheism is the rejection of all religion, all gods, and the supernatural. It is a brash and foolish ideology. I would think that most thinking people would reject atheism and at least be agnostic. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| May 10th, 2015 at 5:35:46 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
Some day you might understand atheism. One thing it's not is an ideology. An ideology is any "body of doctrine, myth, belief, etc., that guides an individual, social movement, institution, class, or large group." Atheism is one thing and one thing only, a rejection of theism. It contains no beliefs, no ideas. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| May 10th, 2015 at 6:24:38 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | You are really good at definitions. By the way I am still waiting for your definition of evidence and why none of the previously mentioned evidence for God is actually not evidence. By the way what is stopping me from saying that Theism is one thing and one thing only, an acceptance of theism? By the way you are fooling yourself if you think your rejection of God has no effect in guiding how you see the world, yourself, and others. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| May 10th, 2015 at 7:23:04 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
For the same reason it wasn't evidence to Einstein, Asimov, Ben Franklin, Freud, Woody Allen, Stephen Hawking, Edison, Ford, Carnegie, Carl Sagan and many other people far smarter than I could ever dream of being. If it wasn't evidence to them, what should that tell you about the 'evidence'. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| May 10th, 2015 at 7:27:09 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | I think they would all say it is evidence, just not convincing enough for them. Many of those you mentioned unfortunately suffer from the philosophy of empiricism. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| May 10th, 2015 at 7:38:47 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
No they wouldn't, evidence is evidence. It either points to something or it doesn't. You can't just wave your hand around and proclaim the universe was created by a god because it seems that way to you. Smart people want to see the evidence, not something based on your opinion. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| May 10th, 2015 at 8:18:17 PM permalink | |
| FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | Take another look at the above list of evidence that I gave above, which I think points to the existence of God and let me know which ones don't count as evidence. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
| May 10th, 2015 at 8:21:41 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
Which post is it in. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |

