The Election Fraud Thread

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: Gandler

Quote: AZDuffman

Texas purges 1.1 million ineligible voters from rolls.

Includes 6500 non-citizens!

So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way.

And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?

The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.

*fraud potential[./q]

Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.

So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?

I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.

Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it?

What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?

Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...

How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?”

My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html

Looks like a valid investigation. Vote harvesting is a growing problem in the USA. I applaud the TXAG for looking into it.

The endless gaslighting is exhausting. These GOP election officials are a bigger threat to our elections than the minuscule incidence of voter fraud and non-fraud vote harvesting even will be. ope they all drop dead. A Felony conviction for voter intimidation would work too.

Trying to have clean elections is a threat? I guess in the "mind" of a liberal it is. In reality clean elections are the most important thing.

Voter intimidation would be more things like the Black Panthers standing with clubs outside polling places in 2008.

Our elections are already clean.

You mean like the GOP did, for which they had a court order to stop doing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_Security_Task_Force

If they are clean why is the left so afraid of election security?

We support election security, just not election security that isn't needed because it's done for political reasons and not real results that make any difference in the end. Simple as that.

Are you guys just trying to break the record for most nested quotes or something?

Oregon DMV admits to wrongfully registering hundreds of non-citizens to vote

But we were told motor voter would not cause fraud!

Quote: AZDuffman

Oregon DMV admits to wrongfully registering hundreds of non-citizens to vote

But we were told motor voter would not cause fraud!

Wake me when they actual vote and their votes change the outcome of any election. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Oregon DMV admits to wrongfully registering hundreds of non-citizens to vote

But we were told motor voter would not cause fraud!

Wake me when they actual vote and their votes change the outcome of any election. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Do you lock your house when you leave, or will you have locks installed only after you get robbed?

Like the typical left winger, you do not care about security. The point is this is happening no matter how much the left denies it.

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Oregon DMV admits to wrongfully registering hundreds of non-citizens to vote

But we were told motor voter would not cause fraud!

Wake me when they actual vote and their votes change the outcome of any election. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Do you lock your house when you leave, or will you have locks installed only after you get robbed?

Like the typical left winger, you do not care about security. The point is this is happening no matter how much the left denies it.

Funny. My parents never locked the house when I was growing up. And, to my knowledge, nobody ever broke in uninvited. After my parents divorced and Mom bought her own home, it took me a year to convince her to lock her door. And even then, I had to replace the doorknob because she couldn't find the key. And even then, she never used it-she just opened and closed the automatic garage door.

And locks don't 100% prevent break-ins. They just reduce their frequency. Our voting registration systems can't 100% prevent ineligibles from registering our voting. But we can reduce the frequency to that which is reasonably achievable.

What you want is, in order to achieve a mythical 100% elimination of ineligibles, to put up so many restrictions that a statistically significant number of eligibles who exist on the margins of society will also be prevented from registering and voting.

My point is voter fraud is occurs at an insignificant prevalence and does not impact the outcomes of elections. And I dare you to prove me wrong.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Oregon DMV admits to wrongfully registering hundreds of non-citizens to vote

But we were told motor voter would not cause fraud!

Wake me when they actual vote and their votes change the outcome of any election. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Do you lock your house when you leave, or will you have locks installed only after you get robbed?

Like the typical left winger, you do not care about security. The point is this is happening no matter how much the left denies it.

Funny. My parents never locked the house when I was growing up. And, to my knowledge, nobody ever broke in uninvited. After my parents divorced and Mom bought her own home, it took me a year to convince her to lock her door. And even then, I had to replace the doorknob because she couldn't find the key. And even then, she never used it-she just opened and closed the automatic garage door.

And locks don't 100% prevent break-ins. They just reduce their frequency. Our voting registration systems can't 100% prevent ineligibles from registering our voting. But we can reduce the frequency to that which is reasonably achievable.

What you want is, in order to achieve a mythical 100% elimination of ineligibles, to put up so many restrictions that a statistically significant number of eligibles who exist on the margins of society will also be prevented from registering and voting.

My point is voter fraud is occurs at an insignificant prevalence and does not impact the outcomes of elections. And I dare you to prove me wrong.

So, you do not believe much in security after all. Don't need a ton of restrictions. End motor-voter and any "automatic" registrations. Have each county drop off registration forms at every USPS location and various other places. (In PA they used to always be available at State Stores where we buy our booze for example.) Very easy, anyone can figure that out. Each county verifies citizenship and residency. We did this pre-1990s with no issues at all.

Now, I realize liberals think minorities are not intelligent enough to find the post office, but I have confidence this is just their racism and not reality.

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: AZDuffman

Oregon DMV admits to wrongfully registering hundreds of non-citizens to vote

But we were told motor voter would not cause fraud!

Wake me when they actual vote and their votes change the outcome of any election. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming...

Do you lock your house when you leave, or will you have locks installed only after you get robbed?

Like the typical left winger, you do not care about security. The point is this is happening no matter how much the left denies it.

Funny. My parents never locked the house when I was growing up. And, to my knowledge, nobody ever broke in uninvited. After my parents divorced and Mom bought her own home, it took me a year to convince her to lock her door. And even then, I had to replace the doorknob because she couldn't find the key. And even then, she never used it-she just opened and closed the automatic garage door.

And locks don't 100% prevent break-ins. They just reduce their frequency. Our voting registration systems can't 100% prevent ineligibles from registering our voting. But we can reduce the frequency to that which is reasonably achievable.

What you want is, in order to achieve a mythical 100% elimination of ineligibles, to put up so many restrictions that a statistically significant number of eligibles who exist on the margins of society will also be prevented from registering and voting.

My point is voter fraud is occurs at an insignificant prevalence and does not impact the outcomes of elections. And I dare you to prove me wrong.

So, you do not believe much in security after all. Don't need a ton of restrictions. End motor-voter and any "automatic" registrations. Have each county drop off registration forms at every USPS location and various other places. (In PA they used to always be available at State Stores where we buy our booze for example.) Very easy, anyone can figure that out. Each county verifies citizenship and residency. We did this pre-1990s with no issues at all.

Now, I realize liberals think minorities are not intelligent enough to find the post office, but I have confidence this is just their racism and not reality.

Anything that increases the number of eligible voters is okay in my book. Use our back-end systems to weed out those ineligible.

My point is voter fraud is occurs at an insignificant prevalence and does not impact the outcomes of elections. And I dare you to prove me wrong.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Anything that increases the number of eligible voters is okay in my book. Use our back-end systems to weed out those ineligible.

My point is voter fraud is occurs at an insignificant prevalence and does not impact the outcomes of elections. And I dare you to prove me wrong.

The number of eligible voters is the same no matter what. The ineligible should be weeded out at registration.

My point is you admit you do not care about vote fraud. We should be eliminating it BEFORE it affects the outcome. We do not even know if it did, though 2020 proves there is both very good chance it has and that Democrats want it to be easier to do. I do not care if someone has to actually put a little effort in. I do not want the uninformed to be voting.

Quote:

Of the 306 people identified, just two have cast ballots in an election since 2021.

Another nothing burger.