|
| GenoDRPh Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831 | Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things. |
|
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195 | Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly? War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
|
| GenoDRPh Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831 | Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing... |
|
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195 | Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
|
| GenoDRPh Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831 | Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html |
|
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195 | Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html
Looks like a valid investigation. Vote harvesting is a growing problem in the USA. I applaud the TXAG for looking into it. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
|
| GenoDRPh Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831 | Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html
Looks like a valid investigation. Vote harvesting is a growing problem in the USA. I applaud the TXAG for looking into it.
The endless gaslighting is exhausting. These GOP election officials are a bigger threat to our elections than the minuscule incidence of voter fraud and non-fraud vote harvesting even will be. ope they all drop dead. A Felony conviction for voter intimidation would work too. |
|
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195 | Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html
Looks like a valid investigation. Vote harvesting is a growing problem in the USA. I applaud the TXAG for looking into it.
The endless gaslighting is exhausting. These GOP election officials are a bigger threat to our elections than the minuscule incidence of voter fraud and non-fraud vote harvesting even will be. ope they all drop dead. A Felony conviction for voter intimidation would work too.
Trying to have clean elections is a threat? I guess in the "mind" of a liberal it is. In reality clean elections are the most important thing. Voter intimidation would be more things like the Black Panthers standing with clubs outside polling places in 2008. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
|
| GenoDRPh Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831 | Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html
Looks like a valid investigation. Vote harvesting is a growing problem in the USA. I applaud the TXAG for looking into it.
The endless gaslighting is exhausting. These GOP election officials are a bigger threat to our elections than the minuscule incidence of voter fraud and non-fraud vote harvesting even will be. ope they all drop dead. A Felony conviction for voter intimidation would work too.
Trying to have clean elections is a threat? I guess in the "mind" of a liberal it is. In reality clean elections are the most important thing. Voter intimidation would be more things like the Black Panthers standing with clubs outside polling places in 2008.
Our elections are already clean. You mean like the GOP did, for which they had a court order to stop doing? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_Security_Task_Force |
|
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195 | Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: GenoDRPh Quote: AZDuffman Quote: Gandler Quote: AZDuffman
So of the 1 mil, basically 50% were dead and almost 50% simply did not complete the certification process in the required time (that is when you get challenged and they mail you a bunch of paperwork to fill out and you have to return it to certain places at certain times.) This number is far less impressive when you put it this way. And a tiny percentage were non-citizens and felons who lost their voting privilege. In a State that cares so much about election security, that sounds like a Texas problem that they were allowed to register. I am pretty sure the state of Texas is supposed to remove felons when they are convicted?
The point is not just the non-citizens, it is how many were cleared off. Those dead people could be used for mail in ballot fraud for example. Shows that all the states need to regularly clear the rolls. Shows how the left wing is in denial about election fraud potential.
*fraud potential[./q] Wake me when there's actual significant fraud.
So, like, you don't lock your house until it has been broken into?
I lock my house continuously, not in batches and not to make ademonstrative, bigoted show of things.
Why? If nobody has broken in why do you need to lock it? What is "bigoted" about cleaning voter rolls exactly?
Well, targeting brown voters, for one thing...
How is cleaning the rolls “targeting brown voters?” My apologies to the board for having to quote your bigoted statement.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/26/us/texas-latino-voting-rights-investigation/index.html
Looks like a valid investigation. Vote harvesting is a growing problem in the USA. I applaud the TXAG for looking into it.
The endless gaslighting is exhausting. These GOP election officials are a bigger threat to our elections than the minuscule incidence of voter fraud and non-fraud vote harvesting even will be. ope they all drop dead. A Felony conviction for voter intimidation would work too.
Trying to have clean elections is a threat? I guess in the "mind" of a liberal it is. In reality clean elections are the most important thing. Voter intimidation would be more things like the Black Panthers standing with clubs outside polling places in 2008.
Our elections are already clean. You mean like the GOP did, for which they had a court order to stop doing? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_Security_Task_Force
If they are clean why is the left so afraid of election security? War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
