The Trump implosion thread!

Quote: AZDuffman

An op-ed by some coward who can't even say who they are has zero credibility.

I’m not defending the op-ed writer (I’d agree they’re a coward).

I’m just pointing out it’s not just liberals who know what a POS Donald is...

Quote: ams288

I’m not defending the op-ed writer (I’d agree they’re a coward).

I’m just pointing out it’s not just liberals who know what a POS Donald is...

What part of peace and prosperity do you not like?

Quote: AZDuffman

You need to get out of your bubble. The public is very misinformed, and sorry to say it is worse on the Democrat side. Look at how many liberals thought Obamacare meant they now had "free health care." Look at Occasio-Cortez, an educated Democrat, and how just utterly clueless she is on virtually everything. I would say probably half of Democrats either do not know what happens if a POTUS is remover thru impeachment or else think it is something totally wrong (Hillary, special election, etc.)

Heck, right on one of these boards I forget who the liberal was did not even know animals know when the female is in cycle and that is the only time they have sex. Yes, it is that bad.

No one ever said as much. You obviously don't know that male dogs don't need a female in cycle when they try to mate. A human female can have sex with a male dog. A male dog can go at it with a fluffy toy for that matter.

Horses as well.

Quote:

Considering all stallions, all of those which do ground collection, approximately one-half to two-thirds will respond adequately without a stimulus mare, especially once they get going. They learn the routine and become conditioned to respond to that without a mare. Super enthusiastic or rowdy stallions, in fact, often are more manageable and do better without any stimulus mare and with ground collection. You can temper their enthusiasm to just enough to get the job done.

https://thehorse.com/132732/ground-vs-breeding-mount-semen-collection/

Quote: Evenbob

In the House he can be impeached because
he farted crosswise. In the Senate it has to
be proved he committed a crime or high
misdemeanor while in office. This is why
no president has ever been kicked out,
the process is too exacting.

The Senate doesn't have to prove anything.

They vote, on each article of impeachment, and decide whether or not to remove the person from office for each article of impeachment that they were convicted, I.e the result of each vote.

The reasons no presidents had been kicked out is not because the process is too exacting.
In Johnson's case, they were one vote short
In Nixon's case, he resigned first.
In Clinton's case, it was a bunch of party line votes, putting party before the law.

Edit: fixed incorrect name

Quote: Dalex64

In Clinton's case, it was a bunch of party line votes, putting party before the law.

Who do you believe put "party before the law", republicans or democrats?

Quote: Dalex64

The Senate doesn't have to prove anything.

They vote, on each article of impeachment, and decide whether or not to remove the person from office for each article of impeachment that they were convicted, I.e the result of each vote.

The reasons no president's had been kicked out is not because the process is too exacting.
In Hamilton's case, they were one vote short
In Nixon's case, he resigned first.
In Clinton's case, it was a bunch of party line votes, putting party before the law.

I think you mean Johnson?

Quote: fleaswatter

Who do you believe put "party before the law", republicans or democrats?

Saw a writing analyst who did it
for the FBI for 20 years. They
look at what's written and try and
learn what they can about the author.

He said from the way it's worded it's
doubtful it came from a high up
position in the WH. If it came from
the WH at all, it's probably a low
level flunkie who's reporting rumors,
or just making a lot of it up.

Quote: AZDuffman

I think you mean Johnson?

Yes, I did mean Johnson. I think I had Hamilton on the brain from my son playing the soundtrack.

Quote: fleaswatter

Who do you believe put "party before the law", republicans or democrats?

Both, actually.

Quote: Dalex64

The Senate doesn't have to prove anything.

The House has to prove it to the Senate.

"The proceedings unfold in the form of a trial, with each side having the right to call witnesses and perform cross-examinations. The House members, who are given the collective title of managers during the course of the trial, present the prosecution case, and the impeached official has the right to mount a defense with his or her own attorneys as well."

They investigate each article of
impeachment to see if the crime
was really committed. It's a regular
trial, with crimes read and crimes
proven or disproven.

It's all moot anyway. If by some
miracle the House goes Dem, the
Senate won't. And every Dem
senator and one third of the Repub
senators would have to vote to
impeach. That's a joke, no Repub
coming up for reelection in the next
election would cut his own throat
like that.

Half the Dems out there think if
the House votes, Trump is gone.
And half of them think Hillary
gets sworn in.