Confessional
December 4th, 2019 at 8:18:54 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | Bob, the history of confession is not as it you describe it based on that book. It began as a very public and difficult procedure. You had to confess your sins publicly to the whole Church and receive a very strenuous public penance that sometimes would take months or years to complete. Private confession with a priest developed from Ireland and the monks there and was a welcome change for all involved. This is what began the confessional boxes. And yes it provided not only anonymity to the penitent but also protection for both the priest and the penitent for any abuses. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 4th, 2019 at 8:22:17 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
Yes. There are other places where people can be free to confess their sins and tell the truth without reprisal. I think of doctors, attorneys, and psychologists. What all of these have in common is that the primary concern is the health and well-being of the individual. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 4th, 2019 at 9:23:53 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
For the priest? It was started because the priests were out of control in abusing the women in the congregation. It's the oldest story, men using their power to get sexual favors from females. And a priest in those days was next to god in holiness, he could abuse his power without any fear of retribution. It was kid in a candy store time. The box was used to literally put a wall between the woman and the priests roaming hands. Imagine how rampant the abuse was if that kind of drastic step had to be taken. Your problem is, you think all priests of the past were just like you and your friends. Intelligent and educated. They weren't. Many of them were uneducated dullards forced into the priesthood by pushy families. Having a priest in your immediate family was a feather in your cap, it made you 'somebody' in the social ranking. So you have a ton of these reprobates running amok for centuries, abusing their power. It had to be curtailed, so the penalty box was invented. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 5th, 2019 at 3:41:37 AM permalink | |
AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18204 |
Sounds like living in Nazi Germany where kids were encouraged to rat on their parents. Glad I do not live in such a place. The President is a fink. |
December 5th, 2019 at 10:52:18 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Imagine how bad it had to be with priests abusing women. Women had no rights, they were 2nd class citizens. Yet enough of them complained that it eventually got back to the Vatican and they had to act. The abuse by priests must have been out of control on a scale we can't even imagine. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 5th, 2019 at 11:19:48 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 | I don't know Bob you are pretty good at imagining things. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
December 5th, 2019 at 11:54:59 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
I'm not imagining this. The average age for a priest in the US is 63. That means there are the same number above 63 as below it. This is very bad news for the Church. As priests retire and die off, they aren't being replaced by enough new priests. The number of priests in the world is the same as it was 50 years ago. But the number of Catholics in the world has doubled. Unless some radical changes are made in the next 10 years, there will a crisis that's out of control. Allowing women in the priesthood is the only answer. They Church must drag itself out of the 15th century. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 5th, 2019 at 12:46:21 PM permalink | |
Dalex64 Member since: Mar 8, 2014 Threads: 3 Posts: 3687 |
That is not correct. What you are describing, with the same number of samples above and below a number, is a "median", not an "average" or "mean" for example, for the series {1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 100, 100, 100, 100} the median is 2 the average is just over 45. So, the average age of the US priest is 63, but that does not tell you that half are older and half are younger. "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan |
December 5th, 2019 at 1:32:13 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
"In 1970, fewer than 10 percent of priests were over the age of 65. Median age of the priests in the new study is 64." So there are just as many above 64 as below it. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
December 5th, 2019 at 2:07:07 PM permalink | |
Dalex64 Member since: Mar 8, 2014 Threads: 3 Posts: 3687 |
Ok fine, I just wanted to point out that average and median are not the same thing, and that average does not mean half above and half below. "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan |