Trump 2025

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: rxwine

First Amendment

Bye. Nice knowing you.

Hey rxwine and Gandler, could you help me out?

I haven't been unable to find any of your postings concerning the 1st Amendment when the bidumb administration (white house, DOJ, FBI, etc} forced/pressured Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media platforms, to censor and remove postings by American citizens.

Hmmmm, could it be that if it wasn't a double standard both of you wouldn't have any standard at all?

Can you cite examples were that happened and what happened in court? You see, I can: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

I'm trying to figure out how Trump is going to trick the Dems to boycott The View:

Quote: SOOPOO

Your head is in the sand. Even the liberal heads of ABC realized how ‘controversial’ calling the murderer of Charlie Kirk ‘one of their (MAGA) own’. When you and every rational observer know the kid sleeping with a trans man/woman was not ‘MAGA’. ABC and a few of their affiliates cut bait, and quickly. A private company decided to fire an idiot. That’s what really happened. If the company and idiot wanted to keep on keeping on, they could have fought the FCC in court. That’s even IF the FCC actually did anything!

The left hitches its trains to the wrong people! Kimmel. Kilmer Abreu. Omar. Brown. Mamdani.

Segue.. watching TV. Dolphins have a player named Storm Duck.

It wasn't the liberal heads of ABC. It was the conservative heads of the affiliates, coupled with the coercion from the executive branch.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: rxwine

First Amendment

Bye. Nice knowing you.

Hey rxwine and Gandler, could you help me out?

I haven't been unable to find any of your postings concerning the 1st Amendment when the bidumb administration (white house, DOJ, FBI, etc} forced/pressured Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media platforms, to censor and remove postings by American citizens.

Hmmmm, could it be that if it wasn't a double standard both of you wouldn't have any standard at all?

Can you cite examples were that happened and what happened in court? You see, I can: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

Well then do it - do it

It is 100% obvious that you did not take time to actually read the opinion.

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: rxwine

First Amendment

Bye. Nice knowing you.

Hey rxwine and Gandler, could you help me out?

I haven't been unable to find any of your postings concerning the 1st Amendment when the bidumb administration (white house, DOJ, FBI, etc} forced/pressured Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media platforms, to censor and remove postings by American citizens.

Hmmmm, could it be that if it wasn't a double standard both of you wouldn't have any standard at all?

Why, because you come here and set the example of a balanced view? No need to answer as it is an obvious no.

I hardly ever actually say the actual words "1st Amendment" but have talked a lot about this or that thing about who can say what based on it.

My general answer has been more speech is the answer to other speech, not censorship. But as far as I can remember I always favor private property over the right to say anything if you're not the property owner. However I have complained plenty about the particular rules of different sites. I don't believe in censoring foul words, but that's what the site owner punishes.

I also go with the classic limitations that you can't yell "Fire, in a crowded theater." and anything similar.

Frankly I couldn't figure out what the best thing to do about people not being able to criticize public health, but finally settled on that government doesn't have to endorse crackpot and often contrary advice or give it equal time. Just let it exist somewhere. Because you're literally endorsing life threatening results. But it took me a while to settle on that.

Finally, I once tried to convince The Wizard, that letting someone make 50 posts about the same betting scheme wasn't necessary for free speech. You allow one copy up on the site satisfies free speech, unless the idea is significantly different. I don't remember him agreeing to it though.

Only 10 million or so more to go.

Inauguration day Jan 20, President Trump

Quote:

I will also sign an executive order to immediately stop all government censorship and bring back free speech to America.

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: rxwine

First Amendment

Bye. Nice knowing you.

Hey rxwine and Gandler, could you help me out?

I haven't been unable to find any of your postings concerning the 1st Amendment when the bidumb administration (white house, DOJ, FBI, etc} forced/pressured Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media platforms, to censor and remove postings by American citizens.

Hmmmm, could it be that if it wasn't a double standard both of you wouldn't have any standard at all?

Can you cite examples were that happened and what happened in court? You see, I can: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

Well then do it - do it


I await yours. Put up or shut up.
It is 100% obvious that you did not take time to actually read the opinion.

Garry Kasparov on Putin's takeover

Quote:

Many of the Russian government's targets were never actually arrested or charged with any specific offense. Many more were never targeted at all! A few high-profile people got shaken down and everyone else got the message.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: GenoDRPh

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote: rxwine

First Amendment

Bye. Nice knowing you.

Hey rxwine and Gandler, could you help me out?

I haven't been unable to find any of your postings concerning the 1st Amendment when the bidumb administration (white house, DOJ, FBI, etc} forced/pressured Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media platforms, to censor and remove postings by American citizens.

Hmmmm, could it be that if it wasn't a double standard both of you wouldn't have any standard at all?

Can you cite examples were that happened and what happened in court? You see, I can: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-411_3dq3.pdf

Well then do it - do it


I await yours. Put up or shut up.
It is 100% obvious that you did not take time to actually read the opinion.

You seem to be having some difficulity with formatting your response here. Try again.