Upcoming Presidential Debate

September 23rd, 2024 at 8:52:41 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: rxwine
And you can edit out the fact checking, and Trump still loses.


Thing is none of it helped her she is still polling the same.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
September 23rd, 2024 at 9:20:46 AM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: AZDuffman
Thing is none of it helped her she is still polling the same.


You sure about that?

Look at all those dots that moved from the 1-2pt range to the 5pt range.



Even Nate Silver has her winning now…

“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
September 23rd, 2024 at 11:22:25 AM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 30
Posts: 5257
Quote: AZDuffman
Giving questions to and fact checking only one side is bias. That the last debate was biased was a being proven. CNN is fake news so why bother.

She is not showing to the roast event that has been held since 1960 she is so afraid.


You mean the same roast event Trump refuses to confirm attendance at?

If fact checking scares your canidate, that should tell you something about your canidate. Trump is mad that he got called out for making insane statements like babies being aborted after birth and immigrants eating dogs, stuff that is so outrageous, the fact that it is untrue should be self-evident.
September 23rd, 2024 at 11:43:19 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 5744
I hate the arguments implying two different statements can’t both be true, when they obviously are

1. The moderators at the last debate were biased against Trump

2. Regardless of the moderators actions, Harris wiped the floor with Trump during the debate.
September 23rd, 2024 at 12:00:18 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: Gandler
You mean the same roast event Trump refuses to confirm attendance at?

If fact checking scares your canidate, that should tell you something about your canidate. Trump is mad that he got called out for making insane statements like babies being aborted after birth and immigrants eating dogs, stuff that is so outrageous, the fact that it is untrue should be self-evident.


No issue if they fact check both sides. But she is allowed to say what she wants. Like I said he is doing the right thing.

And hate to break it to you but democrats have voted to allow abortion after birth and I do not doubt pets have been eaten.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
September 23rd, 2024 at 12:11:32 PM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 13466
Quote: AZDuffman
And hate to break it to you but democrats have voted to allow abortion after birth and I do not doubt pets have been eaten.


There is no such thing as abortion after birth. Only a fool would be so confused about such a simple fact.
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
September 23rd, 2024 at 12:32:54 PM permalink
GenoDRPh
Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831
Quote: SOOPOO
I hate the arguments implying two different statements can’t both be true, when they obviously are

1. The moderators at the last debate were biased against Trump

2. Regardless of the moderators actions, Harris wiped the floor with Trump during the debate.


(1) Were the moderators biased against Trump, or biased against his egregious lies? I dare anyone who thinks they were biased against Trump to defend as factually correct "they're eating dogs" and "“post-birth abortions" and "execution after birth, it’s execution, no longer abortion."

I am completely okay with lies being fact checked, and egregious lies being stopped in their tracks. We should all be biased against lies.

(2) Agreed.
September 23rd, 2024 at 12:34:32 PM permalink
GenoDRPh
Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831
Quote: Gandler
You mean the same roast event Trump refuses to confirm attendance at?


The roast turned from a roast to partisan political event in 2016. Donny saw to that, and Cardinal Dolan tacitly permitted it and agreed.
September 23rd, 2024 at 2:05:42 PM permalink
DRich
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 57
Posts: 5896
Quote: ams288
By his own account, Duffman did not watch the first debate:


I would personally not watch the debates if I was offered $100 to do so.
At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a deterrent.
September 23rd, 2024 at 3:11:36 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: GenoDRPh
(1) Were the moderators biased against Trump, or biased against his egregious lies? I dare anyone who thinks they were biased against Trump to defend as factually correct "they're eating dogs" and "“post-birth abortions" and "execution after birth, it’s execution, no longer abortion."

I am completely okay with lies being fact checked, and egregious lies being stopped in their tracks. We should all be biased against lies.

(2) Agreed.


They were biased against Trump. Common in these debates, why I refuse to watch anymore. As to the eating pets I think the left wing is more upset that it is being pointed out how many Haitians are being dumped in our cities than anything else.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength