In the News II

Quote: AZDuffman

Where did I say it was? I said it is something the taliban liked to do.

Yes they did. But for different reasons than us. You're comparing apples to bowling balls.

Quote: AZDuffman

So you are saying atheists do not believe in shall not murder or steal those are just things religious people believe?

That is not what I said, murder and stealing are prohibited in just about every legal texts in the world. By that logic, we should have the North Korean Code on our walls as well. I do think 6 of the 10 are total nonsense for sure though (not the two you cited,) and borderline dangerous. There are only 4 that are reasonable.

Quote: Gandler

Yes, of course, they are 100% religious tenets. But, I was mostly focused on the mandatory bibles, which is also 100% religious.

What I get out of all this, is the folks in the Bible Belt are drawing lines trying to preserve their heritage and genetics from radical Communists.

Quote: DoubleGold

What I get out of all this, is the folks in the Bible Belt are drawing lines trying to preserve their heritage and genetics from radical Communists.

What do you even mean by this?

Quote: Gandler

What do you even mean by this?

It's about taking advantage of a conservative Supreme Court to prevent total destruction of the individual family structure.


Ever since JFK was shot, a far-left radical progressive faction has aggressively been attacking family structure.

Obvious examples include Roe v Wade attacking innocent souls, which was recently reversed.


The legal precedent in question occurred a little after, around 1980.

It's been a steep down hill ever since.


Then recently, a female Supreme Court nominee "devalues" all women by not defining what a woman is.

The evil has crept in all society to where young girls are at extremely high risk.


The most important person in the family glue became a target of these far-left progressive lunatics.

Apparently, that was the last straw.

According to Jonathan Turley in a long op-ed piece he says that the Supreme Court last week turned to the so-called insurrection on January 6th into trespassing. This lets Trump mostly off the hook and should get most of the people who were put in prison out of jail. The Biden justice department way overstepped itself on this one it's just more political Warfare in those poor people who got crushed by it who were doing nothing wrong in the capital.



https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4746932-scotus-just-downgraded-the-insurrection-to-trespassing/

Quote: Evenbob

According to Jonathan Turley in a long op-ed piece he says that the Supreme Court last week turned to the so-called insurrection on January 6th into trespassing. This lets Trump mostly off the hook and should get most of the people who were put in prison out of jail. The Biden justice department way overstepped itself on this one it's just more political Warfare in those poor people who got crushed by it who were doing nothing wrong in the capital.



https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4746932-scotus-just-downgraded-the-insurrection-to-trespassing/

That is all it ever was. If it was BLM they would not even call it that. Shows how important a non-activist court is.

Quote: AZDuffman

That is all it ever was. If it was BLM they would not even call it that. Shows how important a non-activist court is.

Even if you don’t want to call it an insurrection it certainly was a riot which followed trespassing. And just because our police/justice system failed miserably during the BLM riots/looting does not mean it should be repeated for the January 6 criminals.

I believe it of course should be defined as an insurrection, as the goal of the majority of the imbeciles there was to stop the legal election results to be carried out. The fact that it never had a chance of success is not relevant to the criminal activity and intent.

Quote: SOOPOO

Even if you don’t want to call it an insurrection it certainly was a riot which followed trespassing. And just because our police/justice system failed miserably during the BLM riots/looting does not mean it should be repeated for the January 6 criminals.

I believe it of course should be defined as an insurrection, as the goal of the majority of the imbeciles there was to stop the legal election results to be carried out. The fact that it never had a chance of success is not relevant to the criminal activity and intent.

So, were the reports of people trying to sway electors in 2016 an insurrection? What about the ones who tried to invalidate absentee votes in FL in 2000?

It ain't over; Trump's appointees on the USSC simply returned the favor.

Whatever, no surprise, and what is so direly imporant about presidential politics?

How much will the election of one candidate or another actually affect the bottom line of your / my life?

Trump's term did nothing to derail me and my situation, nor has Biden's current term: just a bunch of BS to get us all worked up over nothing.