The Trump Arrest thread

Quote: Gandler

It's a false equivalency. I don't support protesting on sidewalks outside of private homes (though you have on other circumstances, so it is selective outrage). But, I think it is wrong all around. However, as long as protests stay on a public right of way, and don't impede traffic or cause a noise disturbance, it is generally regarded as legal (I find it to be in poor taste, a bad tactic, and think any group who does it swings low).

However, protesters who have made threats to the Supreme Court have been arrested (as they should).

You are really hiding the ball. Whether or not Trump threatened somebody is the issue. You can point out endless circumstances of other threats and see if people got arrested or did not. But, protests are not threats. And, if protesters do use threats I would be the first to say that they should be arrested. Not addressing something, and just pointing out perceived wrongdoing by other parties does not change the base issue.

You are essentially proving my point (assuming your claims about mass amount of people using threats and not being arrested are true), if somebody is not arrested who should be that is a failure of justice. And, right now Trump can be counted in that group of somebody who should be arrested who has not been. And, Trump is infinitely more dangerous than some wackjob on the sidewalk, because he controls thousands of wackjobs on the sidewalk.

Quote: kenarman

So posting on line where the Judges kids go to school is not a threat? That is a huge implied threat and basically is encouraging nut cases to threaten or even harm the judges children. You still seem to be under the impression that some of them were arrested. The only one arrested was armed and admitted to police he was there to kill the judge.

Quote: kenarman

So posting on line where the Judges kids go to school is not a threat? That is a huge implied threat and basically is encouraging nut cases to threaten or even harm the judges children. You still seem to be under the impression that some of them were arrested. The only one arrested was armed and admitted to police he was there to kill the judge.

Quote: terapined

What law is broken ????????????????

Quote: kenarman

It is against federal statute to intimidate federal judges. Look it up!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote: terapined

I believe its an unconstitutional law

Quote: terapined

I believe its an unconstitutional law

Quote: SOOPOO

Now I understand. It’s not up to anyone to enforce any laws that terapined believes is unconstitutional! You asked him what law was broken. He told you. So your response is YOU don’t believe the law is constitutional!!!! I’m waiting with bated breath for your lawsuit challenging the validity of the law to protect our Supreme Court justices and their families….

Quote: SOOPOO

Now I understand. It’s not up to anyone to enforce any laws that terapined believes is unconstitutional! You asked him what law was broken. He told you. So your response is YOU don’t believe the law is constitutional!!!! I’m waiting with bated breath for your lawsuit challenging the validity of the law to protect our Supreme Court justices and their families….