Trump vs Hillary 2016
Thread Rating:
| December 5th, 2016 at 10:40:04 AM permalink | |
| pew Member since: Jan 8, 2013 Threads: 4 Posts: 1232 | Maybe there's a few more snipers then? |
| December 5th, 2016 at 10:46:43 AM permalink | |
| pew Member since: Jan 8, 2013 Threads: 4 Posts: 1232 | You either get the Trump or you don't. If you don't get it by now you probably never will which explains the ongoing and never ending angst of the leftist/progressives. You'll never understand why Mrs. Bill Clinton lost to a self serving buffoon. |
| December 5th, 2016 at 11:44:47 AM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
So you have no answer. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| December 5th, 2016 at 12:20:53 PM permalink | |
| Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | It's too bad Perot didn't win in 92. He'd have been terrible, and the American people would know better than to entrust their country to an inexperienced populist billionaire. Plus he wasn't the racist, xenophobe that Trump is. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
| December 5th, 2016 at 12:47:09 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
Much better to entrust it to an inexperienced community organizer who had zero business experience, zero dealings with other countries, and who sat in Reverend Wright's extremely racist white hating/Jew hating church for 20 years? Do that and you get the F'd up mess of country we have now. 20 mil who have quit looking for work, a health care plan that's going broke, food stamp rolls at record highs, companies leaving the US in record numbers. Barry will go down as the worst president in 150 years. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| December 5th, 2016 at 12:52:46 PM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
I'm sure that's what the reporters at Breitbart will keep telling you over the next four years. There is no need to even attempt to argue with a rightie like Evenbob over Obama's legacy. The poll numbers speak for themselves... Notice how he mentions 20 mil who have stopped looking for work. I have a feeling come Jan. 20, he will never mention the labor participation rate again under Donald's regime. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| December 5th, 2016 at 1:07:10 PM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 137 Posts: 21195 |
Poll numbers do not rate a presidency. Obama at this point looks to be at best average in a historical sense. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
| December 5th, 2016 at 1:23:33 PM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
Yes... they do. Poll numbers are data. They shift over time. We can look at Obama's poll numbers at this point in his presidency and also those of Reagan, Clinton, and W. at the same point and see how they compare. Saying he's best at average "in a historical sense" is pure nonsense with no substantiation. I could say "He's the greatest of all time - in a historical sense" and it'd be just as nonsensical, but carry the exact same weight as your assessment since neither of us provided any evidence. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| December 5th, 2016 at 1:28:27 PM permalink | |
| Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
Obama's legacy achievement should have been the Transpacific Partnership. But that got lost in the passions of the present. It's too bad. As it is, the Americas as a whole run s a trade deficit against most Asian nations. Lots of trade barriers would have fallen. Now they won't, and it will push many countries in Asia inside China's economic and commercial sphere of influence. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
| December 5th, 2016 at 1:49:59 PM permalink | |
| RonC Member since: Nov 7, 2012 Threads: 9 Posts: 2582 |
The poll numbers are "data"...but there is other "data" to consider: --The President has remained personally popular, which is one data point. --His party, with the most experienced candidate to ever run for the office of President, lost the office to an outsider with zero experience. --His party lost ground in individual states across the country --His party failed in what, based on his poll numbers, should have been a great opportunity to win the Senate. I have no idea where he will place on the rankings of Presidents moving forward...but his terms as President did not excite the voters enough to want more of the same... |

