Simple question?

Thread Rating:

February 22nd, 2016 at 8:32:33 PM permalink
Dalex64
Member since: Mar 8, 2014
Threads: 3
Posts: 3687
Quote: FrGamble
I realize that analogies will always break down when pushed but there is a way to prove that ice cream is unhealthy for you. There is also many ways to prove that a religion is unhealthy. There are also ways to prove which religion is better for you that do not involve your own personal tastes. You cannot do this with different flavors of ice cream because they are all just various types of ice cream. However, if you are comparing ice cream to say eating your vegetables than you can show that even if you don't like the taste of vegetables that it is better for you than ice cream.


You are still missing my point.
It isn't about whether or not ice cream is healthy,
Or if religion is healthy or unhealthy,
Or comparing ice cream and vegetables.

It is about whether or not you are making a decision/selection based on facts or a decision based on opinion or desire, regardless of whether or not your opinions or desires can be backed by facts.
"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan
February 22nd, 2016 at 8:32:35 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: FrGamble
Sin: noun; acts that human beings commit that go against what we know we should do or the failure to act when we know we should. To go against our conscience. To do things that we regret and do not correspond to our beliefs or moral standards,
.


Sin as it pertains to your religion:

'transgression of the law of God'

That's it, that's all. I'm not going over all
this again. As I'm sure you've forgotten,
there is a 182 page thread where we
beat this subject to death. Nothing
has changed since then.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
February 22nd, 2016 at 8:36:36 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: Dalex64
It is about whether or not you are making a decision/selection based on facts or a decision based on opinion or desire, .


Have you forgotten there are no facts
or evidence that any religion is true?
So of course it's about two things.
Upbringing or desire. If you were raised
in a certain faith, you generally are
so brainwashed you have no choice
but to continue with it. If you convert,
you do it to a religion that you desire,
that's pleases you. It can't be for the
facts, there aren't any.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
February 22nd, 2016 at 8:51:54 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Quote: Evenbob
Sin as it pertains to your religion:

'transgression of the law of God'



So if you don't believe in God there is no such thing as sin? This is again circular logic. Do you not recognize that you can transgress and do transgress your own moral law or secular beliefs?
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
February 22nd, 2016 at 8:53:28 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Quote: Dalex64

See the problems?
If God doesn't want anyone to go to hell, two possible solutions are for there to be no hell, and for god to not send any humans there.


These are not the only two possible solutions. In fact the truth is that God did not create hell for any humans to go there, it is for the Devil and demons and not meant for us.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
February 22nd, 2016 at 8:55:16 PM permalink
FrGamble
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 67
Posts: 7596
Quote: Dalex64
You are still missing my point.
It isn't about whether or not ice cream is healthy,
Or if religion is healthy or unhealthy,
Or comparing ice cream and vegetables.

It is about whether or not you are making a decision/selection based on facts or a decision based on opinion or desire, regardless of whether or not your opinions or desires can be backed by facts.


You may be drawing a false dichotomy here. Wouldn't it make sense that a decision based of facts or truth also is something that would appeal to our desires and opinions? The point I am making is that there are facts that should support and back up your decision, which is the case with Christianity.
“It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” (
February 22nd, 2016 at 9:27:39 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: FrGamble
So if you don't believe in God there is no such thing as sin?


If you don't believe in Santa, there are no
flying reindeer and sleigh? They're both
myths, just like god and sin are myths.
If you believe in one, you absolutely
have to believe in the other. Sin is an
integral part of the god myth, it's the
glue that holds it together. One does
not exist without the other, not possible.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
February 22nd, 2016 at 9:39:31 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: FrGamble
These are not the only two possible solutions. In fact the truth is that God did not create hell for any humans to go there


And yet the myth says humans do go there.
The myth god could stop it and he doesn't.
That's kind of monstrous, who would want
a god like that. If the myth god really loved
ALL his creation, nobody would ever go
to hell.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
February 22nd, 2016 at 9:41:30 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Quote: FrGamble
The point I am making is that there are facts that should support and back up your decision, which is the case with Christianity.


We need real facts, not the ones you've
talked yourself into so you can be a believer.
You have no facts at all, just guesswork
and supposition.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
February 22nd, 2016 at 9:54:16 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22942
Hell doesn't make sense as a just (as in justice) action on any level no matter who ends up there.

One can only assume, they couldn't impress non-believers with a more mild limited hell, so they basically went way beyond the scope of actual justice.
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.