 |
 |
Taliban kills 132 children
| December 19th, 2014 at 1:27:36 PM permalink | |
| petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | It worked pretty well for America The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |
| December 19th, 2014 at 2:32:12 PM permalink | |
| TheCesspit Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 23 Posts: 1929 |
Took a long time. It is said that your life flashes before your eyes just before you die.... it's called Life |
| December 19th, 2014 at 8:30:28 PM permalink | |
| rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18770 |
Going to kill 7136. Now there's a specific plan. more here http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/national/20-Dec-2014/kill-terrorists-even-those-in-afghanistan-punjab-lawmakers You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
| December 19th, 2014 at 8:36:49 PM permalink | |
| rxwine Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 189 Posts: 18770 |
Same God working both sides. Like football helping both teams. You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really? |
| December 20th, 2014 at 12:36:15 PM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18220 |
Not killing because of their religion, killing because of their actions. But I am glad you think muslims wanting to kill people based on their (non-muslim) religion is disgusting as it is. Trying to establish a Christian religion would not be impossible at all, it would just take a generation or two and the will to keep it going. At the moment muslims are trying to do the same in the west, they do not seem to have concerns. The President is a fink. |
| December 20th, 2014 at 1:24:36 PM permalink | |
| petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | What would be the difference between stoning people to death for not being proper Muslims and burning people at the stake [Salem witches] for not being Christian enough? Or what about Hindu honour killings? Then there is some remote uncontacted tribe killing for voodoo. It makes sense when your group is doing the killing. When that close to death all pretense fades away and there is a sometimes unfamiliar moment of very clear reality which changes your thinking forever. 800,000 deaths in 100 days;http://tutsisoftherwandangenocide.blogspot.com/2011/05/rwandan-genocide-did-not-just-happen-by.html The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |
| December 21st, 2014 at 6:26:40 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18220 |
Are people burning witches today? I really don't see that happening. Lets look at the world today. And today the fact is that Islam is the most violent religion out there across multiple countries. Second fact is said violence is getting worse not better. The President is a fink. |
| December 21st, 2014 at 11:32:27 AM permalink | |
| petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 |
My post was partly responding to yours where you say "If we want the Taliban put down it means we have to be brutal. We need to not just kill every fighter they have, we need to use their guts to grease the treads of our tanks. The ones not killed need to be rounded up and locked up, probably forever. The area needs a de-islaming program with Christian missions set up, like in the old days. To really fix it will take 2 or 3 generations and until every person alive today is dead" I didn't think you were seriously suggesting killing all the Muslims and making them turn Christian, maybe you were? What, so then they can be peaceful like us? Sure, plenty of Muslims are violent. Look at who is manipulating them. The US printed the school books used in their Madrassa's, for crying out loud. We armed the Mujahadeen and trained them. We trained and funded OBL. We are still arming and training Muslims in MENA. And the day they decide to use those arms and training because they believe in a different God, all of a sudden you want to point out that they are violent because of their religion. You also want to put a time line on this thread, not going back to burning bitches, ok. What religion would you say dropped all the bombs on Iraq and Libya? What religion dropped the only atomic bomb on an enemy in history? The one who's name must go unmentioned was thought of as some kind of Christian. Would you say that whoever is pushing the button that launches the cruise missiles is a religion? If not then would you say they are Godless? What are we [the west] fighting for? We killed well over a million Iraqi's. We are responsible for the Shaw, who's secret police killed and tortured over a million Iranians. We are currently also arming Israel who against the UN rules dropping white phosphorous in kids in Palestinian land. Which religion condones that? The cruelty and killing isn't just Islam. If you want to blame them for the most killing, you have blinders on. Count the dead, the crippled and the maimed. Does removing the heads of 3 Americans [who apparently weren't using them anyway] somehow justify killing over two million people? The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |
| December 21st, 2014 at 12:02:38 PM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 135 Posts: 18220 |
Killing every last muslim? No, not suggesting that. I am suggesting we have no qualms about killing the extremists on the battlefield. Part of why we will not win, however, is the population of the USA wants to do this thing where we say, "well, not all muslims are bad!" We did not say this kind of thing in WWII. We went for unconditional victory. We didn't care if they "hated us." Today we have too many people who want to be liked and will just concede their values to do so. As to making them turn Christian, I am just looking at reality. Islam has shown that it cannot live peacefully alongside non-muslims. Let the muslim population get to 10% or more of a nation's population and you have the beginnings of major instability. At 40% you are looking at civil war. And at 60% you are openly non-muslim at considerable peril to yourself. No other religion is like this. So yeah, start converting the kids and snuff it out as much as is needed.
Yes, we backed the Shah because he was our guy an if he fell then the USSR would have taken Iran as another satellite. We trained OBL, we also armed the USSR. Israel would be happy to not drop bombs, all the muslims need to do to stop Israeli bombs is to quit firing rockets into Israel. You are free to say "The cruelty and killing isn't just islam" but islam has decided the west is the enemy. Geopolitics is a complex and fluid game. No permanent allies, just permanent interests as they say. The President is a fink. |
| December 21st, 2014 at 2:03:42 PM permalink | |
| petroglyph Member since: Aug 3, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 6227 | How can we possibly win when we are fighting and invisible enemy [terrorism] when the goalposts continue to move? Many of us don't even know who "we" are. These conflicts we are mired in historically wouldn't need all the branches of our military. These are covert ops. I think we have two types of government in this country, one mic [that Ike warned us about and Kennedy confirmed] and the so called "opposing" branch, the CIA, which would more describe how Bush #1 or even the current CIC operates.
These libs I here about or the left. Those are what McCarthy would have called communists, or if someone prefers, socialists. Education went down the drain and history repeats. I guess there is more to the Kondratiev cycle than I originally thought. If an enemy lands on our shore, I will fight them myself. Sacrifice my children for some bankers interest half a world away, I would rather shoot my kid in the leg. Although as a form of service I highly recommended the Coast Guard. They are involved with saving lives and "homeland security", the other branches are more involved with killing. If it need be, then let it be so. All we are doing around the world is creating conflicts, not looking to stop them. Look at the Christian churches and Jewish synagogues in Iran and Syria. They have been there and attended for thousands of years, peacefully. When Saddam was dictator of Iraq there were different types of Muslims as well as Christians all with they're own places of worship. Look at India. See above. There are plenty of examples of mass killing in the last century alone that did not involve Muslims. See Hitler [Christian], Stalin [Jewish] Mao, Pol Pot, etc. They were mass murderers on a grand scale, but you want to continually blame it on Islam. Syrians citizens right now are maintaining synagogues in Syria although there may be as few as 9 jews that haven't moved. They are doing it purely for historical purposes. During this conflict, blocks away from battle. I lost that link but here is one: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Secrecy_News%3A_Dept_of_State_Delays_Release_of_Iran_History/40187/0/38/38/Y/M.html What we are eliminating in MENA is secular governments that allowed other religion and replacing them with fanatics.
We installed the Shaw as admitted by our CIA. We did it because [Mossadegh] [Irans democratically elected leader] wanted to nationalize they're oil and use the proceeds for the Iranian people. He wanted to do so against the wishes of British Petroleum, [Aramco]. The Soviets were no more a threat then than they are now. We continue to antagonize them. There is a world of difference between "rockets" and missiles. Israel has occupied 90% of Palestinian territory since '67. What would you do if if Palestinians captured 90% of America and Russia kept rearming them? Who is Islam? Find them and if they are the enemy, blow them to hell. You have my best wishes. That is all they have to fight with, is threats and some suicide bombers. Look at the numbers and put it in perspective. Again, we are responsible for killing over two million of them. Do you want to bomb or go to war with every perceived threat? What about asteroids, or outer space aliens [Reagan]. You and I both know there is a real and present danger, right here in this country. Let alone our border. If we want to secure our liberty need to work closer to home. There isn't enough wealth [capitol] in America to be in every single fight on the planet. We are in mult-trillion dollar conflicts on the opposite side of the globe while social security is collapsing. Who are we trying to "save the world" for exactly? The last official act of any government is to loot the treasury. GW |