Iran..

I see that Vlad "the Trump-nailer" Putin is sharing intelligence about the location of US forces with Iran.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-secretly-sharing-location-of-us-targets-with-iran-us-officials-say/ar-AA1XGq3O?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=69aba6e3b8f441d1a1c69595354e816e&ei=15

Quote: missedhervee

I see that Vlad "the Trump-nailer" Putin is sharing intelligence about the location of US forces with Iran.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-secretly-sharing-location-of-us-targets-with-iran-us-officials-say/ar-AA1XGq3O?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=69aba6e3b8f441d1a1c69595354e816e&ei=15

He's trying to make Russia Great again at the expense of the US

Quote: missedhervee

I see that Vlad "the Trump-nailer" Putin is sharing intelligence about the location of US forces with Iran.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-secretly-sharing-location-of-us-targets-with-iran-us-officials-say/ar-AA1XGq3O?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=69aba6e3b8f441d1a1c69595354e816e&ei=15

He will call Putin
Putin will lie and deny it
He will announce to the press Putin told him he wasn't helping Iran

Fascinating time lapse video
We are so screwed
Obviously this administration didn't forsee the consequences of attacking Iran

Timelapse shows change in the flow of ships in the Strait of Hormuz https://share.google/q1KsHUGzcLkUhF7B7

Trump says, "Cuba is next." Cuba hasn't been a threat for years, so he's definitely going to be making shit up if he's going to do anything more than a blockade.

There's only ONE "final cure" for a rabid dog.

I wonder what "unconditional surrender" looks like. Germany unconditionally surrendered...after their cities an industrial areas were flattened their armies defeated in the field. Then we occupied the country, and are still there. Japan unconditionally surrendered...after their cities and population centers were flattened, their nation starved of food and fuel and after 2 nukes dropped on them. Then we occupied the country and are still there.

So what does Donny want?

Senator John Fetterman asks:

Why do Democrats now universally condemn what achieves a top, longstanding Democratic priority?

Quote: fleaswatter

Senator John Fetterman asks:

Why do Democrats now universally condemn what achieves a top, longstanding Democratic priority?

Hmmmmmm

Because in the US and elsewhere, the means matter.

Quote: fleaswatter

Senator John Fetterman asks:

Why do Democrats now universally condemn what achieves a top, longstanding Democratic priority?

Hmmmmmm

Because Iran was not about to achieve a nuclear weapon. We were roped in by Israel.

Also, Clinton and Harris are well known as war hawks and don't speak for the progressive wing of the party. So random statements by them over 10 years ago are not super relevant.