Trump 2025

Quote: AZDuffman

MGTOW is neutral towards women. It is just men saying they are done chasing them. I am sure you support feminists who say “they don’t need a man” so if that is ok then what is wrong with MGTOW?

Apparently women today under 40 are insufferable if they're even halfway good looking. All the fives think they're tens and all the tens think they're 15s. They all think they deserve a guy that has a fat paycheck, a thin waistline, lots of hair, is at least 6 ft tall, and will support them totally. Oh and he has to be extremely good looking. So now what's happening is men are totally ignoring women in that age group because they get shut down all the time. Women can't get men to talk to them it's driving them crazy. The men are saying hey, I got my truck, I got my boat, I got my motorcycle, I got my giant big screen TV, what I don't got or need is a ball and chain woman around my neck. Women that age group bring nothing to the table, what they think they bring is what they've got between their legs. What they don't realize is when a man has passed 24 or 25 he starts really not caring about that very much anymore and can live without it.

An honest mistake. He looked like an illegal which is good enough for the clueless.

Quote:

North Carolina man's 'Deport Them All' sign targets neighbor, a legal U.S. citizen | Thu, Aug 21
A North Carolina man admits his sign encouraging President Trump to deport immigrants is targeted at his neighbor, a legal U.S. citizen. WITN's Chris Cooke reports.

Quote: rxwine

An honest mistake. He looked like an illegal which is good enough for the clueless.

Maybe they are just problem neighbors? It happens. I'm sure your neighbors could verify that.

Quote: AZDuffman

Well that is why we have many methods of birth control for females. But a society with a high abortion rate is a society in decline. A society that celebrates it is sick indeed.

How many of those methods of birth control are only available due to court decisions mandating access, and do you agree with efforts to restrict of eliminate access to certain methods of contraception?

Quote: GenoDRPh

How many of those methods of birth control are only available due to court decisions mandating access, and do you agree with efforts to restrict of eliminate access to certain methods of contraception?

I don't think any are only available due to "court decisions." I agree with restricting access to minors same as we do cigarettes. I have no issue with some forms being "behind the counter" similar to pseudo cold pills. We do not have a problem with women not being able to obtain birth control in this day and age.

Quote: AZDuffman

I don't think any are only available due to "court decisions.

You think wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

Do you oppose any efforts to roll back or overturn those decisions, since you support a female's access to contraception?

Quote: GenoDRPh

You think wrong: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griswold_v._Connecticut and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

Do you oppose any efforts to roll back or overturn those decisions, since you support a female's access to contraception?

Ancient decisions overturning laws in blue states. Not an issue today.

Quote: AZDuffman

Ancient decisions overturning laws in blue states. Not an issue today.

Still binding precedent. Do you support efforts to overturn those decisions?

Quote: GenoDRPh

Still binding precedent. Do you support efforts to overturn those decisions?

What efforts? I have never heard of any. Are there any or are you just running your mouth about it to listen to yourself?

Quote: AZDuffman

What efforts? I have never heard of any. Are there any or are you just running your mouth about it to listen to yourself?

Justice Thomas wants to overturn them. Do you agree with him?