Trump 2025

Quote: AZDuffman

Quote: rxwine

You'll pick the trans woman for your mail order bride.

Heh heh. Nope. They are your thing, not mine. As has been shown here many times.

WTF?!?! This dude just brought up "trans women" AGAIN out of nowhere!?

Why are trans women always on this dude's mind?!?!?!?! 🤮🤮🤮

Quote: Shrek

WTF?!?! This dude just brought up "trans women" AGAIN out of nowhere!
Why are trans women always on this dude's mind?!?!?!?! 🤮🤮🤮


My god, was that a Freudian slip by missedhervee?!?! Does he play on Ams' team after all??? 😂😂

Nah, I was simply parroting / building upon what Stormy Daniels remarked about his...ahem..."package."

Not too impressive, apparently...but I bet that he and most MAGA men get to hear that a lot.

With that USSC vote for $2 billion, it likely shows Barrett & Roberts are under duress.

Temporarily ignoring Barrett, I'd say it's likely a Deep State person has control of the Epstein evidence, possibly incriminating Roberts.


It could explain why nothing has been released yet.

Bondi and Patel can't access the evidence or haven't gotten to it yet.


I'm beginning to think Bondi is an undercover deep state RINO.

They switched Gaetz with Bondi.

The only one out of 20 nominations so far.

So it stands out like a red flag.


Obviously, Roberts' voted like he's in the clear.


If Bondi is a redcoat, Trump might want to consider taking a loss and get another nominated.

Quote: missedhervee

Nah, I was simply parroting / building upon what Stormy Daniels remarked about his...ahem..."package."

Not too impressive, apparently...but I bet that he and most MAGA men get to hear that a lot.

Wouldn't the majority of men fit into that category of "not too impressive"?

Quote: DRich

Wouldn't the majority of men fit into that category of "not too impressive"?

Depends on who is judging.

Trump might impress a midget.

I know Tanko always has issues with the CBO.

But anyway, concerning Trump's Big Beautiful Bill.

Quote:

The Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan in-house think tank that referees the process, said that when setting aside Medicare, the total funding in the committee’s jurisdiction is $8.8 trillion over a 10-year period. Medicaid accounts for $8.2 trillion of that, or 93%.

When excluding Medicare and Medicaid, the committee oversees a total of $581 billion in spending — much less than the $880 billion target — the CBO said

About 300 billion short.

Quote:

That leaves Republicans in a deep predicament. The budget resolution, adopted by the slimmest of margins in the narrowly divided House, was the delicate product of negotiations between conservative hardliners who are demanding steep spending cuts and swing-district GOP lawmakers who say they don’t want to slash funding for the health programs that their constituents rely on

Quote: rxwine

I know Tanko always has issues with the CBO.

But anyway, concerning Trump's Big Beautiful Bill.



About 300 billion short.

And that’s the beauty of our system. If Trump wants to go ‘too far’, there is the house or senate to reel him in. The house is such a slim majority, and the Senate has the filibuster. And the courts have already struck down some executive orders. Trump wants to ‘do it all’, but will only be able to do ‘some’. And he and his party will be judged in 2026 on what the results of the ‘some’ was. If it’s good, we will still have a Republican House/Senate. If not, it’s gonna be a LONG last two years for Trump.

Let's put this to a test. It's a pretty bold prediction.

Quote:

Former SSA Commissioner Martin O’Malley warned that recent cuts at the agency at the hands of the Department of Government Efficiency could lead to a “collapse” of the Social Security system “within the next 30 to 90 days.”

“Ultimately, you’re going to see the system collapse and an interruption of benefits,” O’Malley said. “I believe you will see that within the next 30 to 90 days.”

Since President Musk may make adjustments, assuming his comments on knowing when to revert something back to its former self, it may not come true at all just for that reason. But who knows.

I would think a former SSA administrator would have enough inside information to know what would happen, but since I don't know him from Adam, he has no track record. So, just wait and see if anything happens at all.

Quote: rxwine

Let's put this to a test. It's a pretty bold prediction.



Since President Musk may make adjustments, assuming his comments on knowing when to revert something back to its former self, it may not come true at all just for that reason. But who knows.

I would think a former SSA administrator would have enough inside information to know what would happen, but since I don't know him from Adam, he has no track record. So, just wait and see if anything happens at all.

Sounds like the swamp trying to save itself.

Quote: SOOPOO

If it’s good, we will still have a Republican House/Senate. If not, it’s gonna be a LONG last two years for Trump.

If you asked me 5 years ago, I'd say sure. As far as I'm concerned, Trump tried to destroy election the process once already in his own sell-interest.

He's really trying to consolidate all power in the executive. No evidence otherwise. He bows to no one. MAGA stupidly loves him more for doing it. If you hold no "cards" you're in trouble, as Zelinsky has found out.