Kamala Harris

Quote: AZDuffman

YES! He can say how be believes boys need tampons and people not old enough to buy cigarettes or booze should be allowed to get sex change surgeries. Please let him do it!

Duffy truly seems to be spiraling.

Quote: ams288

Duffy truly seems to be spiraling.

Maybe he needs a tampon?

Quote: SOOPOO

when you say 49 states you are just showing how biased you are or out of touch with reality. You think Trump can win California or New York?

Ok, then it will be a 48-state landslide. 😎

"Democrat vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz is getting called out by the leftist Washington Post for his false claim that he carried weapons “in war.”

The story that Walz is a lying Stolen Valor toadie is not getting bigger by the day it's getting bigger by the hour. What a piece of work this jackass is. If the Washington Post is on you and you're a Democrat you're in deep crap.

Quote: DoubleGold

Quote: Gandler

Walz seemed to learn from his mistakes and give up alcohol completely which is at least a positive outcome.

He "seemed to learn from his mistakes"? Really? Who told you that?
Was it the same "gold standard" news sources whose fake news you believed before??? 😂

Note: For those of you who don't know what I'm talking about, Gandler was bragging earlier about the "gold standard" news sources that he reads, and he was wagging his finger at AZ and lecturing him about Thomas Crooks. And this is the best part.....in reference to donations that Crooks made, he (FALSELY) said:

Quote: Gandler

...before people talk about him giving money to some left wing groups, that was somebody of the same name, almost 3x the shooters age.... That whole talking point was a distraction by the right wing where they tried to conflate somebody of the same name as a distraction...

But guess what?? The so-called "distraction by the right wing" was 100% CORRECT! Crooks DID make those donations! 😂 So his "gold standard" news sources fed him FAKE NEWS......and he bought it hook, line & sinker. Even libbie Snopes proved that it was fake news LOL!!! 🤣🤣🤣 https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-shooter-donation

I can't wait for Trump to win this election in a landslide. KKKamala and her KKK looking running mate don't stand a chance! 😎

I've read with some bemusement about the Minissota bill mandating period products in boys restrooms, E.g https://alphanews.org/walz-signs-bill-requiring-schools-to-stock-period-products-in-boys-bathrooms/

"“the products must be available to all menstruating students” in grades four through 12""

I understand that covers in the US. age 9-18 ?

I see that ...
“Not all students who menstruate are female,” Feist said. “We need to make sure all students have access to these products.”

I agree!

According to Feist, non-female menstruators “face a greater stigma and barrier to asking for these products.”

I'll take her word for it!

Feist is one of five authors of an opinion piece titled “Menstruators deserve equity at school.”



So. First off, I commend absolutely the provision of free sanitary products for all young people that menstruate. So I'd raise no objection to provision in toilets that are used by (as the saying goes) Biologically female persons. Good use of tax dollars.

As liberal as I am, I recognise that a significant proportion of menstruating, born female, persons identify as male and prefer to use boys restrooms. What I struggle with is the proportionality of the situation. If, say 5% of menstruators identify as male and use male restrooms, then surely most of the sanitary products in boys restrooms will be used for other than their intended purpose. Was it beyond the imagination of legislators and schools to make the products available to some discreet common room near to both sets of restrooms.

In most UK public venues, such as supermarkets, there are male toilets, female toilets and gender neutral 'disabled' toilets. Some just have the gender neutral restrooms. There is no stigma to the non-disabled person using the more spacious gender neutral toilets. Just put the period products there.? Or is there some stigma in the US to use of gender neutral toilets?

The legislation looks silly because it extends provision to the fringe situation. Much as I like minorities getting fair, equal, and even generous provision, I can't see this as reasonable and cost effective. But then, I've never been discriminated against because of my gender foibles.

Quote: OnceDear

I've read with some bemusement about the Minissota bill mandating period products in boys restrooms, E.g https://alphanews.org/walz-signs-bill-requiring-schools-to-stock-period-products-in-boys-bathrooms/

"“the products must be available to all menstruating students” in grades four through 12""

I understand that covers in the US. age 9-18 ?

I see that ...
“Not all students who menstruate are female,” Feist said. “We need to make sure all students have access to these products.”

I agree!

According to Feist, non-female menstruators “face a greater stigma and barrier to asking for these products.”

I'll take her word for it!

Feist is one of five authors of an opinion piece titled “Menstruators deserve equity at school.”



So. First off, I commend absolutely the provision of free sanitary products for all young people that menstruate. So I'd raise no objection to provision in toilets that are used by (as the saying goes) Biologically female persons. Good use of tax dollars.

As liberal as I am, I recognise that a significant proportion of menstruating, born female, persons identify as male and prefer to use boys restrooms. What I struggle with is the proportionality of the situation. If, say 5% of menstruators identify as male and use male restrooms, then surely most of the sanitary products in boys restrooms will be used for other than their intended purpose. Was it beyond the imagination of legislators and schools to make the products available to some discreet common room near to both sets of restrooms.

In most UK public venues, such as supermarkets, there are male toilets, female toilets and gender neutral 'disabled' toilets. Some just have the gender neutral restrooms. There is no stigma to the non-disabled person using the more spacious gender neutral toilets. Just put the period products there.? Or is there some stigma in the US to use of gender neutral toilets?

The legislation looks silly because it extends provision to the fringe situation. Much as I like minorities getting fair, equal, and even generous provision, I can't see this as reasonable and cost effective. But then, I've never been discriminated against because of my gender foibles.

Here is the thing. You do not "identify" as male or female. You are born, no conceived, as one or the other. Anyone who thinks we need tampons in a male restroom is not fit for their post, from governor down to a mop job.

This is an example of what I keep pointing out about "educated" vs. "smart." Someone educated reads this kind of gobbelygook and believes it. Smart people simply say, "Males do not have periods, and they have nowhere to put a tampon. Are you trying to make a jerk out of yourself saying they need them??"

Quote: AZDuffman

Here is the thing. You do not "identify" as male or female. You are born, no conceived, as one or the other. Anyone who thinks we need tampons in a male restroom is not fit for their post, from governor down to a mop job.

This is an example of what I keep pointing out about "educated" vs. "smart." Someone educated reads this kind of gobbelygook and believes it. Smart people simply say, "Males do not have periods, and they have nowhere to put a tampon. Are you trying to make a jerk out of yourself saying they need them??"

Stick to researching property deeds at the local courthouses or wherever, because you are completely ill-informed at biology.

These libbie protesters made her lose it...........she's so embarrassing man! 😂

Kamala Harris brutally heckled by Pro Palestine protesters

Quote:

The legislation looks silly because it extends provision to the fringe situation. Much as I like minorities getting fair, equal, and even generous provision, I can't see this as reasonable and cost effective. But then, I've never been discriminated against because of my gender foibles.

If they barely get used, it’s not expensive. They’ll just serve as extra storage for when the girl’s bathroom runs out on occasion..