In the News II

February 9th, 2024 at 12:38:56 PM permalink
GenoDRPh
Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 0
Posts: 648
Quote: DoubleGold
Let's see if Anna gets framed.

She better be squeaky clean.

-----------------

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

Feb 8, 2024
.
.
.
To whoever leaked my bill:

Congratulations, you played yourself.

I make no apologies. My bill, the SCHUMER Act, would require Members of Congress to fight on the front lines in Ukraine if they support Schumer’s calls for American sons & daughters to fight.
.
.
.
https://twitter.com/RepLuna/status/1755595821892907513

------------------


Schumer wants US boots on the ground in Ukraine?
February 9th, 2024 at 12:38:56 PM permalink
GenoDRPh
Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 0
Posts: 648
Quote: DoubleGold
Let's see if Anna gets framed.

She better be squeaky clean.

-----------------

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

Feb 8, 2024
.
.
.
To whoever leaked my bill:

Congratulations, you played yourself.

I make no apologies. My bill, the SCHUMER Act, would require Members of Congress to fight on the front lines in Ukraine if they support Schumer’s calls for American sons & daughters to fight.
.
.
.
https://twitter.com/RepLuna/status/1755595821892907513

------------------


Schumer wants US boots on the ground in Ukraine?
February 9th, 2024 at 12:46:00 PM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 30
Posts: 2506
Quote: GenoDRPh
Schumer wants US boots on the ground in Ukraine?



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/02/schumer-threatens-send-us-troops-fight-russia-unless/
February 9th, 2024 at 12:48:05 PM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 12547
Quote: GenoDRPh
Schumer wants US boots on the ground in Ukraine?


No. Any rightie who misconstrues what he said into that is, obviously, an idiot.
“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
February 9th, 2024 at 12:55:39 PM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 30
Posts: 2506
They (the elite not Schumer) just want the money to make sure high tech firms (plantation owners) are in gear.

The plantation owners have to eat too and they don't go long without eating.

They've been doing this for years.

It's negotiation so they can access the Treasury funds.


It's similar to shutting down the government due to budget authorizations.

It's all an act, like in a movie, so the reps can explain to their constituents.


Meanwhile, someone's getting the money.

I doubt Ukraine will get much of it.


When you get older, it's the same game, just different wars.

It can be vetoed, if a person is an outsider.

But that person wouldn't last long.


Here it is (300+ pages of plantation pork):

https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/emergency_national_security_supplemental_bill_text.pdf
February 10th, 2024 at 4:23:01 PM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 30
Posts: 2506
The reason why a person can be deemed mentally unfit to stand trial (see Hur of DOJ) but fit enough to run the USA corporation is because of the VP.

In other words, a two-tiered justice system is apparently better than Kamala running the country.


I disagree.

Voters for Biden have to suffer the negative consequences of their choice.

A person that's holding the nuke codes, cannot be mentally unstable.

So he's got to go, even though he's likely better handicapped than Kamala.

Kamala needs to be inserted.


I'd say double up the security for Kamala and protect her in anyway possible, because the elite want Joe out.

Joe can no longer help the elite access the Treasury funds.

And if they don't get paid, noone gets paid.
February 11th, 2024 at 4:35:33 PM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 12547
Pollster Frank Lutz is at the Super Bowl.

Notice the woman in red behind him (Nikki Haley?)

“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
February 11th, 2024 at 8:08:27 PM permalink
ams288
Member since: Apr 21, 2016
Threads: 29
Posts: 12547
Chiefs win the Super Bowl!

Phase 1 of the DNC’s psyop is complete…

“A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman
February 13th, 2024 at 1:46:27 PM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 22
Posts: 4178
I’m not making this up. United Airlines had to ground some spanking new planes because they were not compliant with an FAA regulation. You’ve seen those ‘no smoking’ signs, the ones with an ‘X’ over a cigarette? Apparently these new Airbus planes had them automatically turn on. That is in violation of the 1990 regulation that says no smoking signs must be manually turned on by the flight crew.
I wish I was a fly on the wall when the geniuses who made this regulation were discussing it.
February 13th, 2024 at 2:19:25 PM permalink
JimRockford
Member since: Sep 18, 2015
Threads: 2
Posts: 971
Quote: SOOPOO
I’m not making this up. United Airlines had to ground some spanking new planes because they were not compliant with an FAA regulation. You’ve seen those ‘no smoking’ signs, the ones with an ‘X’ over a cigarette? Apparently these new Airbus planes had them automatically turn on. That is in violation of the 1990 regulation that says no smoking signs must be manually turned on by the flight crew.
I wish I was a fly on the wall when the geniuses who made this regulation were discussing it.

The Max 8 I was on a few weeks ago didn’t have those no smoking signs at all, which makes sense. The signs are a holdover from an age when smoking onboard was sometimes allowed and sometimes not.
The mind hungers for that on which it feeds.