Ukraine conflict

April 11th, 2022 at 7:10:43 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Austria, Cyprus, Finland, Ireland, Malta, and Sweden are members of European Union, but not of NATO.

Quick Reference table showing year they entered NATO
1949 United States Not EU
1949 Canada Not EU
..
1949 United Kingdom Not EU
1949 Iceland Not EU
1949 Norway Not EU
1952 Turkey Not EU
2009 Albania Not EU
2017 Montenegro Not EU
2020 North Macedonia Not EU
..
1949 Belgium EU
1949 Denmark EU
1949 France EU
1949 Italy EU
1949 Luxembourg EU
1949 Netherlands EU
1949 Portugal EU
1952 Greece EU
1955 Germany EU
1982 Spain EU
1999 Czech Republic EU
1999 Hungary EU
1999 Poland EU
2004 Bulgaria EU
2004 Estonia EU
2004 Latvia EU
2004 Lithuania EU
2004 Romania EU
2004 Slovakia EU
2004 Slovenia EU
2009 Croatia EU
Not Nato Austria EU
Not Nato Cyprus EU
Not Nato Finland EU
Not Nato Ireland EU
Not Nato Malta EU
Not Nato Sweden EU
April 15th, 2022 at 4:19:14 AM permalink
odiousgambit
Member since: Oct 28, 2012
Threads: 165
Posts: 6378
Quote: rxwine
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-airs-its-ultimate-revenge-plan-for-america/ar-AAW5HB1?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6c2942bef84746b6ae470f7e333a9bd7
yet this could also be Russian input. It seems they want division, division, division ... so let the Left get worked up about Russians favoring Trump, that's good, it's not important that they thus defuse Trump's influence if they really want Trump to succeed [debatable] ... it's the division that's important
I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me]
April 15th, 2022 at 4:22:40 AM permalink
odiousgambit
Member since: Oct 28, 2012
Threads: 165
Posts: 6378
the Neptune missile(s] that sank the Russian ship [a disputed claim] are Ukrainian. They got the know-how from "the Soviet Kh-35" which maybe they helped manufacture

I'm Still Standing, Yeah, Yeah, Yeah [it's an old guy chant for me]
April 15th, 2022 at 5:31:53 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22942
Quote: odiousgambit
the Neptune missile(s] that sank the Russian ship [a disputed claim] are Ukrainian. They got the know-how from "the Soviet Kh-35" which maybe they helped manufacture



Pretty sure US and all NATO were keeping the Ukrainians updated on the geolocation of that ship which would be quite helpful.
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.
April 15th, 2022 at 9:59:04 AM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 160
Posts: 5496
Quote: rxwine
Pretty sure US and all NATO were keeping the Ukrainians updated on the geolocation of that ship which would be quite helpful.


You bet they are.

The US may not have boots on the ground in Ukraine but we're sharing our satellite surveillance / drone intelligence with them.

Speaking of drones...

I know that the US doesn't want to pit our soldiers directly against Putin's but I see a lot of gray area where in fact we are instrumental in affecting the outcome.

The first thing (other than surveillance) that comes to mind is the notion of armed drones; I recall when we went to Afghanistan we used predator drones (and maybe other types of drone?) to blow stuff up, and it was all remotely controlled by some techie guy in Nevada, on a base; why not have a Ukrainian techie behind the joystick today instead of an American?
April 15th, 2022 at 12:07:43 PM permalink
Tanko
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 0
Posts: 2470
Ukrainian experts worry sunken Russian warship was carrying nukes

"TV presenter Olga Skabeyeva said in Rossiya 1 that “what it’s escalated into can safely be called World War III,” adding that “now we’re definitely fighting against NATO infrastructure, if not NATO itself. We need to recognize that,” the Mirror reported."

"Military commentator Dmitry Drozdenko reportedly said on state-run Channel 1: “In actual fact, a full-scale multi-level war is underway with the collective West. And the West has long been preparing for the war.”
April 15th, 2022 at 2:32:36 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 148
Posts: 25978
Scott Adams agrees with a bunch of generals who believe that this is now a war of supply lines and who can starve out the other Army first. The professional opinion is Russia will win that war because they have an almost unlimited supply of just about everything and a lot more ways to deliver it than the Ukrainians do. Putin never wanted to take Kiev, he knew he couldn't hold it even if he took it. He got what he wanted and is never giving it back.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
April 18th, 2022 at 4:36:06 PM permalink
Gandler
Member since: Aug 15, 2019
Threads: 30
Posts: 5258
Quote: Evenbob
Scott Adams agrees with a bunch of generals who believe that this is now a war of supply lines and who can starve out the other Army first. The professional opinion is Russia will win that war because they have an almost unlimited supply of just about everything and a lot more ways to deliver it than the Ukrainians do. Putin never wanted to take Kiev, he knew he couldn't hold it even if he took it. He got what he wanted and is never giving it back.



I was not sure if all of the Generals were right, but now that Scott Adams agrees with them, they must be.
Supply lines are a pretty advanced military concept that Generals do not understand, its a good thing that he has enlightened the world.


As for Russia winning that depends on your definition of winning. They will not be trusted by the world for another generation (this is a trend for them), so I guess well done? -regardless of how this war ends- Though they are losing by metrics that matter, Ukraine is winning by kill count (even if you count civilians killed by Russia), so not great for such a superior country, Ukraine is winning by global support, Ukraine is winning by economic aid.....

Even if Russia ends up with the Donbas, it will not be worth it, because they will have inflicted more economic damage to their country that whatever they will gain from more oil/gas...... Russia is losing customers every day, they already lost the war, even if they take the full Ukraine (which they will not).
April 18th, 2022 at 5:19:46 PM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Quote: Gandler
I was not sure if all of the Generals were right, but now that Scott Adams agrees with them, they must be.
Supply lines are a pretty advanced military concept that Generals do not understand, its a good thing that he has enlightened the world.


As for Russia winning that depends on your definition of winning. They will not be trusted by the world for another generation (this is a trend for them), so I guess well done? -regardless of how this war ends- Though they are losing by metrics that matter, Ukraine is winning by kill count (even if you count civilians killed by Russia), so not great for such a superior country, Ukraine is winning by global support, Ukraine is winning by economic aid.....

Even if Russia ends up with the Donbas, it will not be worth it, because they will have inflicted more economic damage to their country that whatever they will gain from more oil/gas...... Russia is losing customers every day, they already lost the war, even if they take the full Ukraine (which they will not).


The aid that Ukraine is receiving isn't even close to covering the billions in infrastructure they are losing. Airports, highways, bridges, housing .... It will take decades for Ukraine to recover even if they manage to hang onto parts of the country. This is a much higher cost than Russia is paying in military expenses. If they hang onto their sovereignty that can probably be considered a win but on any other metric it is a terrible loss to the country.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
April 18th, 2022 at 5:24:54 PM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Quote: Gandler
I was not sure if all of the Generals were right, but now that Scott Adams agrees with them, they must be.
Supply lines are a pretty advanced military concept that Generals do not understand, its a good thing that he has enlightened the world.


As for Russia winning that depends on your definition of winning. They will not be trusted by the world for another generation (this is a trend for them), so I guess well done? -regardless of how this war ends- Though they are losing by metrics that matter, Ukraine is winning by kill count (even if you count civilians killed by Russia), so not great for such a superior country, Ukraine is winning by global support, Ukraine is winning by economic aid.....

Even if Russia ends up with the Donbas, it will not be worth it, because they will have inflicted more economic damage to their country that whatever they will gain from more oil/gas...... Russia is losing customers every day, they already lost the war, even if they take the full Ukraine (which they will not).


I did a little searching since my first post and in late March the damage in Ukraine to infrastructure was estimated at $63B it will be at least double that now.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin