Market crashing

March 4th, 2026 at 6:25:55 PM permalink
terapined1
Member since: Nov 26, 2024
Threads: 2
Posts: 713
Quote: SOOPOO
Golly. Trump must not be President today. Because the market soared. Took a whole day to rebound.

It's not a rebound
It's a yo yo
Bottom line
US stocks under performed when compared to foreign stock markets
Out of the 23 most developed on the planet
The US came in 21st place
Tarriffs and war are bad for the US stock market
Especially tarriffs
But with your Dem derangement syndrome, you cheer on tarriffs
It's a no brainer that stocks would have performed better under Harris
The Democrat party supports free international trade
The Republicans used to be for free trade to grow our markets
The Republicans are now AGAINST free trade
Dems and economists and businesses want the free market to determine prices
You want Trump and the govt determine prices via tarriffs
March 4th, 2026 at 6:28:19 PM permalink
terapined1
Member since: Nov 26, 2024
Threads: 2
Posts: 713
March 4th, 2026 at 7:22:57 PM permalink
GenoDRPh
Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831
Quote: SOOPOO
Golly. Trump must not be President today. Because the market soared. Took a whole day to rebound.

I actually agree with you all that that one day drop was due to the perception of bad Trump stuff. But the markets then realize that us bombing Iran does not change how many chips Intel will sell, or how many backpacks Walmart will sell, or if Tesla will sell 5 more cars than predicted.

Ed’s delusional ‘we’d be better with Harris’ posts are so easy for him to post. (Thank God!) it can never be proven wrong. I must remind the audience…. America was so afraid of a Harris/Walz administration they elected the worst presidential candidate in history. Think about that.


The scaredy-cat American racist and exist voter deserves the days they voted for. They didn't realize, as you don't either Scott, that markets do better under a Dem President than a GOP President. Dems bring the USA out of recessions; the GOP brings us into recessions.

The only TDS here is SooPoo, et al. That is: Trump's Deranged Supporters.
March 4th, 2026 at 7:27:01 PM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 160
Posts: 5484
I get the impression that unlike a few of the MAGA bitches here Soopoo is more "measured" in his evaluation and comments about the fat oaf.

He's not on his knees servicing his lord and master as are some of the unintentional comedians here who love to lovingly toot the MAGA horn.

Although I despise Trump I suspect we'd not be much better off under Harris: America does NOT want to have a progressive agenda imposed on the entire nation.
March 4th, 2026 at 7:40:49 PM permalink
GenoDRPh
Member since: Aug 24, 2023
Threads: 5
Posts: 2831
Quote: missedhervee
I get the impression that unlike a few of the MAGA bitches here Soopoo is more "measured" in his evaluation and comments about the fat oaf.

He's not on his knees servicing his lord and master as are some of the unintentional comedians here who love to lovingly toot the MAGA horn.

Although I despise Trump I suspect we'd not be much better off under Harris: America does NOT want to have a progressive agenda imposed on the entire nation.


SooPoo is closet MAGA, but refuses to admit it.

Since 1992, we were better off under Dem Presidents than GOP Presidents. If America doesn't want a so-called progressive agenda, than let them have the days they voted for.
March 4th, 2026 at 9:19:36 PM permalink
terapined1
Member since: Nov 26, 2024
Threads: 2
Posts: 713
Quote: GenoDRPh
SooPoo is closet MAGA, but refuses to admit it.

Since 1992, we were better off under Dem Presidents than GOP Presidents. If America doesn't want a so-called progressive agenda, than let them have the days they voted for.

Absolutely
He's so in the cult, he now firmly believes that the govt should be making decisions for businesses. He no longer believes businesses should have the freedom to make the best decisions to increase profits.
Take my old company American Express
The company is a firm believer in DEI and believes it is central to making a profit
The company believes the employee base should be representative of the customer base.
Does that mean hiring incompetent people
Of course not. That's what Trump does
AMEX looks at the whole package of employment history, schooling, skills and DEI when searching for new talent
Soopoo is against companies having the freedom to consider DEI even though the company believes that is a key to a companies long term profits
March 5th, 2026 at 8:17:18 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 5738
Quote: GenoDRPh
SooPoo is closet MAGA, but refuses to admit it.

Since 1992, we were better off under Dem Presidents than GOP Presidents. If America doesn't want a so-called progressive agenda, than let them have the days they voted for.


Geno is closet Communist, but doesn’t want to admit it.
March 5th, 2026 at 8:22:05 AM permalink
SOOPOO
Member since: Feb 19, 2014
Threads: 25
Posts: 5738
Quote: terapined1
Absolutely
He's so in the cult, he now firmly believes that the govt should be making decisions for businesses. He no longer believes businesses should have the freedom to make the best decisions to increase profits.
Take my old company American Express
The company is a firm believer in DEI and believes it is central to making a profit
The company believes the employee base should be representative of the customer base.
Does that mean hiring incompetent people
Of course not. That's what Trump does
AMEX looks at the whole package of employment history, schooling, skills and DEI when searching for new talent
Soopoo is against companies having the freedom to consider DEI even though the company believes that is a key to a companies long term profits


You like speaking for me, don’t you? I am TOTALLY FOR companies being ALLOWED to use DEI to weaken the strength of their workforce. I am AGAINST the government forcing companies to implement racist DEI. Under Democrat DEI policies, Amex can ‘look at’ the whole package, but MUST use DEI to select some lower qualified individuals. It’s basically the definition of DEI! If two candidates are close, don’t take the one you think is better, take the minority!
March 5th, 2026 at 8:59:10 AM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 160
Posts: 5484
Quote: SOOPOO
It’s basically the definition of DEI! If two candidates are close, don’t take the one you think is better, take the minority!


How else to overcome the racism and marginalization of blacks which is endemic in American culture?
March 5th, 2026 at 9:23:48 AM permalink
terapined1
Member since: Nov 26, 2024
Threads: 2
Posts: 713
Quote: SOOPOO
You like speaking for me, don’t you? I am TOTALLY FOR companies being ALLOWED to use DEI to weaken the strength of their workforce. I am AGAINST the government forcing companies to implement racist DEI. Under Democrat DEI policies, Amex can ‘look at’ the whole package, but MUST use DEI to select some lower qualified individuals. It’s basically the definition of DEI! If two candidates are close, don’t take the one you think is better, take the minority!

This is what you fail to understand
Look at your own comments
"DEI to weaken their workforce"
That's illogical absurd hate
You have 2 candidates pretty equal
One is white and had every advantage in society
The other is DEI and had to overcome lots of discrimination
The discrimination is plain as day with your "weaken" comment
They are strengthening the company but due to your hate, you go with "weaken"
I'm taking the DEI candidate. They overcame a lot more to get where they are
The white person had all the advantages and can't out perform the DEI
It's obvious the DEI candidate is more talented and will go farther in the company

Bottom line
The Democratic party is for freedom to allow businesses to consider DEI
The Republican party is against freedom. They want to prevent companies to consider DEI.
I'm for whichever party is FOR FREEDOM
I'm for whichever party is for the free market determining all prices
I'm for the party that is for free international trade
I'm for the party against wars and for growing the global economy