Trump 2025

September 9th, 2025 at 9:11:53 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: missedhervee
The venal clowns overturned Roe v. Wade.

Good bye, stare decisis...


SCOTUS can overturn previous rulings. Rare, but it happens.

If you do not believe Roe could be overturned because it was "settled law" then you believe we should still have segregation since Plessy was "settled law."

I thought you went to law school?
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
September 9th, 2025 at 9:29:58 AM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 160
Posts: 5497
Quote: AZDuffman
I thought you went to law school?


I did; that's the only thing you've gotten correct so far.
September 9th, 2025 at 10:30:40 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: missedhervee
I did; that's the only thing you've gotten correct so far.


If you did then you would have learned that SCOTUS can overturn itself. I mean, I learned that in flipping high school!

Then again, maybe you think we should still have segregation??
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
September 9th, 2025 at 10:42:51 AM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 160
Posts: 5497
Quote: AZDuffman
If you did then you would have learned that SCOTUS can overturn itself. I mean, I learned that in flipping high school!

Then again, maybe you think we should still have segregation??


No,I simply believe the USSC changed Roe for political, not legal reasons.
September 9th, 2025 at 11:51:07 AM permalink
fleaswatter
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 5
Posts: 1758
Quote: missedhervee
No,I simply believe the USSC changed Roe for political, not legal reasons.

your belief ≠ the law

FYI:

Table of Supreme Court Decisions Overruled by Subsequent Decisions

A short list of overturned Supreme Court landmark decisions

List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions
September 9th, 2025 at 12:03:54 PM permalink
missedhervee
Member since: Apr 23, 2021
Threads: 160
Posts: 5497
IIRC Roe was the result of the implementation of the then-recenty articulated constitutional privacy interest which protects a woman's right to abortion.

I see no reason for the USSC to have changed it other than umbrage / dislike of the decision in Roe.

Politics, pure and simple...i.e. "lawfare."
September 9th, 2025 at 12:25:13 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22942
Elon Musk being the voice of reason here, instead of voice of nonsense.

Quote:
The Department of Energy, led by oil-and-gas veteran Chris Wright, claimed renewables are “worthless” without sun or wind, drawing widespread criticism and a viral two-word clapback from Elon Musk that pointed out the existence of massive energy storage projects that can continue feeding electricity into the grid.
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.
September 9th, 2025 at 2:14:03 PM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: missedhervee
No,I simply believe the USSC changed Roe for political, not legal reasons.




You mean like the lawfare cases against Trump that were for political reasons and not legal ones? Like a case of fraud with no complaint by the lender? Like that?

Other than your not liking the decision you fail to give said legal reasons.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
September 9th, 2025 at 2:19:02 PM permalink
fleaswatter
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 5
Posts: 1758
-loser, leftist, libtard, activist, democRAT judge, Amir Ali. a bidumb appointee, ruled against President Trump

-the 2nd Circuit upheld the district court order 2 to 1, no surprise the two who voted to uphold were appointed by odumdum and bidumb

US Supreme Court pauses judge's order that Trump spend foreign aid
September 9th, 2025 at 2:20:35 PM permalink
fleaswatter
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 5
Posts: 1758
Quote: AZDuffman
You mean like the lawfare cases against Trump that were for political reasons and not legal ones? Like a case of fraud with no complaint by the lender? Like that?

Other than your not liking the decision you fail to give said legal reasons.

Maybe because he isn't a real lawyer? LOL