The Election Fraud Thread

Quote: SOOPOO

As I said, I responded by THINKING about Flea’s post. I am certainly able to comment on it not knowing for sure if it is truth or hogwash. I addressed both possibilities. Geno is incapable of thinking about both possibilities.

Let’s get to the real point. The Democrats have chosen an abject failure in Bass
The Republicans have chosen another reality show guy. So Bass cruises to another failed term.

The SOOPOO lie detector test on California leaders like Pelosi and Newsom would be fun to use asking them how they feel Bass has done!

Quote: GenoDRPh

You responded by being too ignorant about the facts to give an intelligent response. That puts me one up on you about this one particular topic.

Pelosi is a Congresswoman from San Fran. Why would her opinion about Bass matter?

Quote: fleaswatter

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,

Quote: SOOPOO

Quote: fleaswatter

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,

Quote is most likely from LA Times. Possibly AP directly

Explanation finally given…. That the Pratt votes were added about a minute later. Somehow they’re separated in the ‘dump’ by that minute. Seems like it’s really more a typo than evidence of actual fraud.

Of course, whoever would publish the partial result rather than waiting to get ALL the votes counted to that moment is incompetent. Someone blamed it on them being ‘rushed’. That’s BS. I blame it on someone being incompetent.

Quote: fleaswatter

Quote:

AI Overview

The Department of Justice officially debunked social media conspiracy theories alleging that discrepancies in the Los Angeles mayoral race were caused by voter fraud. These false claims surfaced on platforms like X following delayed vote-count updates, prompting federal officials and election experts to set the record straight.

The Claims vs. Facts:The Claim: Viral social media posts, amplified by figures like Elon Musk, alleged that election night updates showed certain candidates (such as Spencer Pratt) gaining zero new votes.The Debunking: The Associated Press explained that the zero-vote appearance was simply a 60-second lag in their automated electronic update system, not fraud. The subsequent batch of votes, posted one minute later, correctly credited candidates with their thousands of new votes.

DOJ Findings: First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, a Trump appointee leading the Los Angeles-based U.S. Attorney's office, directly addressed the rumors by stating the claims are false and that "each candidate received votes in every update".

Why the Discrepancy Rumors Happen:Election experts attribute these persistent fraud myths in California to the state's slow, methodical vote-counting process. California allows mail-in ballots to be counted days after the election as long as they are postmarked on Election Day. As those later ballots are tallied, the results frequently shift, which fuels baseless accusations of a "steal".For further details on how the DOJ addressed the rumors, you can read the full report via CNN Politics.