The Coronavirus thread
Poll
| 2 votes (13.33%) | ||
| 2 votes (13.33%) | ||
| 2 votes (13.33%) | ||
| 1 vote (6.66%) | ||
| 2 votes (13.33%) | ||
| 4 votes (26.66%) | ||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| No votes (0%) | |||
| 1 vote (6.66%) | ||
| 1 vote (6.66%) |
15 members have voted
| March 3rd, 2023 at 5:33:40 AM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 | The last four posts are from DoubleGold with no responses. QUIT SPAMMING “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| March 3rd, 2023 at 5:44:19 AM permalink | |
| DoubleGold Member since: Jan 26, 2023 Threads: 34 Posts: 4240 |
You're making me think you spam. Usually, it's the accusers that are the guilty ones. Should I check your posts for four straight posts? |
| March 3rd, 2023 at 3:06:45 PM permalink | |
| SOOPOO Member since: Feb 19, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 5741 |
Just so you realize this…. There is not another poster here who appreciates the idiotic posts you make. I guess you enjoy reading your writing, but I can assure you no one else does. Your nonsensical posts have made it difficult to enjoy a reasonable back and forth I have with reasonable people. If I was the site owner, you’d be shown the door. I’d say the same about someone who continually claimed the earth is flat. Your batshit crazy posts claiming viruses don’t exist proves one of two things…. You either enjoy trolling the forum or you are just plain batshit crazy. Frankly, there are no other possibilities. |
| March 3rd, 2023 at 3:22:41 PM permalink | |
| DoubleGold Member since: Jan 26, 2023 Threads: 34 Posts: 4240 |
I'd write something like that too if I couldn't debate. |
| March 3rd, 2023 at 5:29:35 PM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
Bravo! “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| March 4th, 2023 at 7:31:29 AM permalink | |
| DRich Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 57 Posts: 5896 |
I don't understand how people still read his posts. I blocked him about 10 days ago and haven't regretted it. In over 10 years I have never blocked any other poster on this site or WOV. At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a deterrent. |
| March 4th, 2023 at 1:43:19 PM permalink | |
| SOOPOO Member since: Feb 19, 2014 Threads: 25 Posts: 5741 |
I don’t think I’ve ever blocked anyone. The subsequent posts often are hard to decipher. I now just skim his posts. I know it’s a flaw of mine, but I do get fascinated by some of the idiotic posts he makes. Sort of like how I’m fascinated by George Santos. |
| March 4th, 2023 at 6:39:23 PM permalink | |
| Tanko Member since: Aug 15, 2019 Threads: 0 Posts: 2470 |
The Court rejected Barden's proof. The Court never said there is no evidence for the existence of the measles virus. "Under paragraph number 122 of the judgment, the HRC concluded that my appeal was successful because "the proof of the existence of the measles virus by ' a scientific publication' was not fulfilled by the plaintiff. The court referred to the court-appointed expert witness, Prof. Podbielski, who testified in writing and orally on record before the recognizing court of first instance that none of the six publications submitted by Dr. Bardens contained proof of the existence of the "measles virus"." - Lanka 'The Federal Court of Justice (FCJ) rejected the untrue reasoning of the plaintiff on 12/01/2016 with clear words. The FCJ justified the rejection with the following words:' "On December 1, 2016, the First Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice passed a resolution by the presiding judge, Prof. Dr. Büscher, the judges, Prof. Dr. Schaffert, Dr. Kirchoff, Prof. Dr. Koch and Feddersen The plaintiff's appeal against the non-admission of the appeal in the judgment of the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court - 12th Civil Senate - of February 16, 2016, is dismissed because the case has no fundamental significance, the complaints based on the infringement of fundamental procedural rights are not upheld and the further development of the law or the safeguarding of uniform jurisprudence do not require a decision by the Court of Appeal in other respects either (Sec. 543 (2), first sentence, ZPO). Pursuant to § 544 (4) sentence 2 half-sentence 2 of the ZPO, no further justification is required." |
| March 4th, 2023 at 10:57:34 PM permalink | |
| DoubleGold Member since: Jan 26, 2023 Threads: 34 Posts: 4240 | In other words, if there were scientific evidence of a virus existing, from the 1954 paper, then Stefan would have lost the case. Stefan knew that paper was bogus (604 citations?). The one paper and the court ruling "deprived the entire virology of its basis" (not just measles, etc.). From Stefan on page 11: --------------------------------------- The causes of the corona crisis are clearly identified Virologists who claim disease-causing viruses are science fraudsters and must be prosecuted 4/2020 Extract . . . Please do not only keep in mind that the decision in the measles trial, which was confirmed by the highest court of law, has deprived the entire virology of its basis. It has been established by a court of law and is therefore part of the German jurisdiction that the publication of the central method of virology from June 1, 1954, in which the unintentional and unnoticed killing of cells in the laboratory was published as proof of the existence of disease-causing viruses, no longer constitutes proof of the existence of a virus from the year 2016! . . . http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/wissenschafftplus-virologists.pdf |
| March 4th, 2023 at 11:59:15 PM permalink | |
| DoubleGold Member since: Jan 26, 2023 Threads: 34 Posts: 4240 | Notice the wording Stefan uses including "mentally combined" and "reality" and "sterile". As in, scientists are unintentionally creating bio-warfare (not found in nature) and incorrectly think it's a virus found in nature. That implies that it's not a virus killing folks. It's man killing folks and the punishment can be harsh (negligence?). ' From the same source on page 8: ------------------------------------------- Components from such cells dying in the laboratory are still today mentally combined to a virus and presented as reality. The virology of disease-causing viruses is as simple as this. Enders and the "virologists" have never, until today, carried out control experiments to "infect" the cells in the laboratory with sterile material. They die in the control experiment in exactly the same way as with supposedly "viral" material. ---------------------------------------------- |

