First Principles
January 17th, 2021 at 11:42:05 AM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
You think Xtianity isn't a cult? It was just the general Xtian rules and guidelines you see everywhere with the religion.
As long as you stay in the guidelines of society and the law. It's all just common sense, actually.
Most of the attention is on the victim, that's why there are laws against burglary, it violates the victim. The police take a victims statement, the insurance company deals with the victim. The criminal only gets attention when he's caught, which 90% of time he isn't.
You can't give any examples of moral absolutism because there aren't any. "There are no examples of moral absolutes since morality itself is subjective, relative and contextual. The truth or falsity of moral judgments, or their justification, is not absolute or universal, but is relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of a group of persons."
Maybe, but mostly not. Most crimes are never punished. Other than guilt, which most crooks deal with early in their careers, there is no punishment for most crimes. The majority of drunk drivers are never caught, only the habitual ones are. White collar crime, like embezzling, is gotten away with 95% of the time. As is shoplifting and most petty theft. Even the big crime of murder is only punished 50% of the time. That's why punishment in the afterlife was invented, it was obvious it wasn't getting punished much in the here and now. It's why parole boards put so much weight into a prisoner being regretful of his crimes. Because the majority of those paroled go right back to crime because they know crime does pay. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 17th, 2021 at 2:07:12 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
So you just depend on society and the law to provide your morality. Seems pretty simple and easy.
Do not lie, cheat, steal, rape, murder the innocent, enslave people, torture them, etc. There are lots of examples of moral absolutes. You mention examples of people doing these things or even pointing out that sometimes societies or cultures allowed these things - but that does not and has never made them good. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 17th, 2021 at 5:02:18 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Morality has to come from somewhere, we are not born with it, it does not exist in the universe outside of us. Most morality consists of common sense. Treat others as you would like to be treated is thousands of years old. Common sense...
"While moral absolutism declares a universal set of moral values, in reality, moral principles vary greatly among nations, cultures, and religions. That's because morality is always a moving target, it's never set in stone. Unless you're a member of an organized religion. Then moral absolutes are the basis of the religion, it's where all their power comes from. You can especially see this in Islam, where people can be stoned to death for violating even a petty moral absolute. Moral absolutism is always dangerous in whatever form it takes. Just go back 500 years and look at the frightening power your Church had because of moral absolutism. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 18th, 2021 at 11:50:39 AM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I agree it is a universal common sense that every shares and has always had. It spans centuries and cultures and is unchanging. We didn't invite it, it is part of us. Maybe we are just using different words to describe the same thing.
While I agree with you that moral absolutism is dangerous; you only need to look at the present day or go back 100 years to see the unspeakable horrors of relativism and the blood it sheds. When anyone or a government thinks that morality is changeable and not set in stone they will change it to their liking and kill or torture anyone they want. You idea that morality is relative and can change is the source of the greatest death, violence, and destruction the world has ever seen. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 18th, 2021 at 12:21:58 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
So why pretend it comes from somewhere outside ourselves. It's a deduction from observation, it's common sense that you get what you give. Treat your neighbor well and they are likely to treat you well. Some god has nothing to do with it.
This only shows that moral absolutism is a fantasy, it doesn't work. It's an idea, a concept, and as such can be stepped around at will. Trying to fool people into believing there are moral absolutes in the universe has never worked and never will work. People are keenly aware they can do whatever they want if they can get away with it. They usually behave because they want to get along in society, not be a hinderance to it. Look how fast good law abiding people turn into savages during rioting. Looting the same stores in their neighborhood they shop in every day. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 18th, 2021 at 12:55:36 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
It is universal and comes from observation and some "common sense" that others are as important as me. As the old saying goes, "common sense is not all that common." As you are prone to point out there are lots of people who ignore common sense and morality and look out only for themselves. That is our temptation and tendency. Left to our own devices and if we really could make up the rules we would amend the golden rule to make an exception for ourselves. We all want to say the rules apply to others but in our case there is an exception and we can do what we want. Therefore this "common sense" morality we agree on is more radical and supernatural when we actually live it out than either of us understands.
How does people breaking the law show that it doesn't work? If anything the results of people trying to pretend there are not moral absolutes make the best argument for their reality and importance. The fact that people ignore moral absolutes is the problem of sin, not a problem with the moral absolutes.
Again the only one doing the fooling is anyone who tries to fool people into thinking moral laws are relative and changeable. That is what will never work, in fact it leads to really big problems and the destruction of society. Your observations about rioting and looting are indeed sad and it is a foretaste of what happens when people abandon the moral absolutes. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 18th, 2021 at 7:03:19 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
Ignore a natural law and you're screwed. Like stepping off a building thinking you're going to float away. Ignore a moral absolute and most of the time nothing at all happens. Criminals know this, that's how they know crime pays very well. Morals are a societal suggestion, many refuse to follow them. who tries to fool people into thinking moral laws are relative and changeable. leads to really big problems and the destruction of society. That just proves how relative and changeable moral laws are. Most need to be rigorously enforced or people would be breaking them more than they already are. They are not set in stone, they are set in murky mud. They are suggestions. Go ahead and steal that candy bar from 7/11, you'll probably get away with it and nobody will know. This is way god was invented, to make people think god will know and punish you later. Look at the old Gypsies as an example, They were typically staunch Catholics yet had their own moral code within their culture, They would never steal from each other, yet would steal everything from an outsider without a thought. Even stealing small children and selling them. They were con artists and grifters and Catholics. Almost half of Gypsy marriages were between first cousins. They had their own moral code within the Church's moral code. I wonder how that was dealt with by the Church. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
January 18th, 2021 at 7:44:45 PM permalink | |
DRich Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 51 Posts: 4967 |
Why do you assume that death is worse than life? At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a detrrent. |
January 19th, 2021 at 12:56:05 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I don't follow your logic here. How does the fact that moral laws are frequently broken and need to enforced by responsible societies show that they are changeable. Enforcing the law against violence or stealing doesn't change the law. You are speaking into the reality of human weakness but it doesn't have any bearing on the moral laws themselves. Lying, cheating, torture are all still unchangeably wrong even if people, lots of people, do it. “It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures.” ( |
January 19th, 2021 at 4:35:45 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25011 |
All morals and moral laws are made up by us, they can be broken or changed by us. Look at slavery again. There was no law against slavery in Jesus time, to them it was not only not wrong, it was a needed part of society. As time went on and we advanced socially, it became wrong. Now you'll say slavery is ALWAYS wrong. To which the response has to be, to who? There is always a caveat to every 'moral law' you name. Stealing is wrong, unless your family is starving and it's justified. Then it's just kinda sorta wrong. Killing another human is wrong, we've already attached 14 caveats to that one. Prisons are full of people who absolutely believe they committed no crime. I didn't break in, the door wasn't locked. I didn't steal that car, the keys were in it. If that store doesn't want me to take their stuff, quit leaving it out where I can easily get to it. Did you know that in this country, up until about the 1920's, things sold in dept stores and even corner markets, was kept out of reach of the customers? Clerks would let you examine something while they watched. A grocery store would take your order while a clerk filled it. They knew people are thieves, even good church going people. Given the opportunity they will give in to temptation. Human nature is not to be fair and just, it's to be greedy and deceitful. This is where your Church comes in, make people behave. Because the universe has no moral 'laws', we make them up as we go along. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |