Romney wins, 234-201

Page 2 of 2<12
Poll
4 votes (33.33%)
4 votes (33.33%)
4 votes (33.33%)
No votes (0%)

12 members have voted

January 31st, 2013 at 11:00:23 AM permalink
miplet
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 8
Posts: 975
Quote: AZDuffman
About the same as a roulette ball landing on black, red, or green.

LOL I've seen a few roulette balls land on the floor :+).
"...remind me of clue: Colonel Mustard in the billiard room with the candlestick."- Derek Morgan
February 1st, 2013 at 3:21:54 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: AcesAndEights
It is an interesting concept, and one notes that the constitution leaves it up to each individual state to decide how to apportion its electoral votes. Maine and Nebraska already follow this process, for example.


If it isn't obvious, there is no requirement that the states assume a winner take all method. Basically, the constitution is mum on the issue.

Historically, states have seen it as a way to increase their pull in the national election. The federal government is not likely to change the constitution on essentially the issue that allowed the states to form a republic in the first place.

As the two largest states, California and Texas should make a pact to both adopt this method. Since the odd districts from either state will likely almost cancel out one another, it is very unlikely to determine the presidential election. With populations in 2012 estimated at 38m and 26m such a decision would immediately engage almost 25% of the country's population much more into the presidential election. Instead we are sidelining this massive group.

I think people need to see it in action, and then they should be permitted to vote on it within their own state.
February 12th, 2013 at 11:01:10 AM permalink
miplet
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 8
Posts: 975
I did my best to get some more info and this is what I have so far for how many votes each Congressional District in each state voted. I got data from dailykos.com which is missing all of New Jersey, and New York's 2-5.
StateObamaRomney
AK01
AL16
AR04
AZ36
CA4112
CO43
CT50
DE10
FL1116
GA410
HI20
IA31
ID02
IL126
IN27
KS04
KY15
LA15
MA90
MD71
ME20
MI59
MN62
MO26
MS13
MT01
NC310
ND01
NE03
NH20
NJ00
NM21
NV31
NY203
OH412
OK05
OR41
PA513
RI20
SC16
SD01
TN27
TX1125
UT04
VA47
VT10
WA73
WI35
WV03
WY01
"...remind me of clue: Colonel Mustard in the billiard room with the candlestick."- Derek Morgan
February 13th, 2013 at 5:07:38 AM permalink
s2dbaker
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 13
Posts: 241
Quote: Wizard
Of the eight votes, what are the odds every Democrat voted to keep things the same and every Republican voted to allocate electoral votes by congressional district?
I voted for Popular Vote.
February 13th, 2013 at 2:08:56 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Wizard
Of the eight votes, what are the odds every Democrat voted to keep things the same and every Republican voted to allocate electoral votes by congressional district?


It seems to me that Britain and France have a very large percentage of their respective populations in a single urban area.

Greater London: United Kingdom population 13,709,000 out of 62,641,000
Paris metropolitan area: France population 11,175,000 out of 65,436,552

I wonder if there is such an obvious political war between the urban and the rural/suburban people as in the USA?
Page 2 of 2<12