Trump vs Hillary 2016
Thread Rating:
| January 12th, 2017 at 7:03:33 PM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 137 Posts: 21195 |
It seems to be like the phony Bush National Guard memos that Rather put on the air. Just wanted them to be true so bad that all common sense goes out the window. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
| January 12th, 2017 at 9:54:17 PM permalink | |
| Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 148 Posts: 25978 |
Just like Rush has been saying for 25 years, the Libs go absolutely bonkers when they aren't in office. It kinda started with Reagan, and kicked into high gear with Bush. Look at Ams, he gets more off the wall every day. I'm watching the West Wing. It's 1999 and it's a Dem president. But he sounds like a Repub. He's against Gays in the military. On many issues the Left is rabid about now, he's neutral. PC was just starting in 99. The show ran till 2006, well into the Bush years. I bet it gets more and more Leftie as the years go by. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
| January 13th, 2017 at 3:01:18 AM permalink | |
| AZDuffman Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 137 Posts: 21195 |
PC started in the mid-1980s, "TIME" did a cover story on it. In fall 1990 I remember an article about it hitting college campuses. By 1999 it was entrenched but nowhere near as bad as it is today. On colleges it is so bad today that men are abandoning college for it and other reasons. "The West Wing" was mostly based on the Clinton Era, with Sheen playing a POTUS with Clinton's leanings but not his personal behaviors. They threw in a bit of JFK being doped up what with the MS angle. Sheen was only supposed to be a sort of bit part, it was supposed to be the WW staff doing all the background work and the POTUS just showing up for doing some POTUS work. Sheen was well-enough received that they expanded the POTUS part. Liberals will keep getting more and more off the wall, and it may be funnier than usual this time what with how much power they have lost up and down the line. Back in the Bush years things were closer divided, so the liberals from more competitive areas could not act as kookish. But now with such a higher percentage from either liberal areas or gerrymandered minority-majority districts they know they will not lose so will go all-out. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength |
| January 13th, 2017 at 4:36:44 AM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
He married one. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| January 13th, 2017 at 6:30:38 AM permalink | |
| Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 | How do you best sum up the 2016 election: A) No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people? or B) There's a sucker born every minute? Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
| January 13th, 2017 at 8:12:42 AM permalink | |
| RonC Member since: Nov 7, 2012 Threads: 9 Posts: 2582 |
It isn't "fake news" as far as my post goes...I knew she had said something terrible during the last part of the year...I just didn't remember what it was...that is why I said "move or something" as opposed to claiming she said that she was moving. She did tweet: "Barron Trump Autistic? if so - what an amazing opportunity to bring attention to the AUTISM epidemic https://t.co/Acgy1Qxyqi via @YouTube — Rosie (@Rosie) November 22, 2016" http://www.snopes.com/2016/11/28/rosie-odonnell-claims-barron-trump-has-autism/ She is a complete idiot. Who in their right mind would say something like that without knowing shit about the situation? She is a pathetic liberal waste of time and space. Of course, she has the right to speak freely. I have the right to think, and say, that she is a piece of garbage. So...no "fake news" reported...I just knew she had said something stupid again!! I have no idea about the other sources; I look past anything that is either not a major news outlet or something liberal-minded, like Snopes, when I put an actual claim out there. That helps me avoid spreading "fake news", which is a problem (for both sides, of course). |
| January 13th, 2017 at 8:26:36 AM permalink | |
| RonC Member since: Nov 7, 2012 Threads: 9 Posts: 2582 |
C. No one bothered to pay attention to the people they were elected to represent and they finally got upset enough to choose an outsider. Some of you just don't get it. Obama was elected on a platform of Hope and Change. It worked. It worked because people wanted change in their lives. They wanted things to be better. You can have your own opinion of how well Obama did; the bottom line is that his time in office still left a lot of Americans--including many long-time Democrat voters--wanting change. I won't argue that he seems to be a better person than Trump, it doesn't really matter in the context of what happened in this election. We weren't electing a Pope and we've certainly had sinners elected to office before. Hillary ran (poorly) on a "same old thing" platform, is hardly a person who generates enthusiasm, and didn't learn a damned thing from Trump's emergence from the Republican primary process. She failed to campaign in vital states. Trump won because he sold the same basic thing as Obama...Change. Someone outside the system. Yeah, I know he is flawed person. He is not perfect in any way. He is not who I wanted to win when this process started. The reason the Republican candidate won is because the Democrats put up a "more of the same" candidate who did not work hard enough to win the election. I don't know why she didn't work hard enough, but you have to think that a few more focused trips to potential swing states, a bit more energy, and a little bit of hope would have won her the election. Instead, she won by 3 million or so in California...which everyone knew she would win...and lost key electoral states. |
| January 13th, 2017 at 8:27:08 AM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
Have you seen the videos of Barron in regards to him potentially being autistic? There's some convincing evidence out there. I think it is very likely he is autistic. There is nothing wrong with that (obviously!) And it could possibly explain Trump's weird views on vaccines and autism. “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |
| January 13th, 2017 at 8:29:52 AM permalink | |
| RonC Member since: Nov 7, 2012 Threads: 9 Posts: 2582 |
Who gives two shits what you have seen? You don't run around saying some kid is autistic to the whole world in a tweet when you don't know any real facts and it is not public information (provided by the parents), do you? |
| January 13th, 2017 at 8:33:28 AM permalink | |
| ams288 Member since: Apr 21, 2016 Threads: 29 Posts: 13466 |
Do you need a safe space? We had the 'is Barron autistic' discussion over at WoV. You must have missed it. Lots of righties freaked out that it was even brought up. That kind of PC crap is what is killing this country! “A straight man will not go for kids.” - AZDuffman |

