In The News Today...

Wouldn't that be something?

------------------------------------------------------

SCOTUS to Reconsider Hearing Case Accusing Biden, Harris, Pence, and Other Lawmakers of Violating Oaths by Ignoring 2020 Fraud Allegations

Feb 16, 2023

The Supreme Court is reconsidering whether to hear a lawsuit filed by Raland J. Brunson that alleges President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.

Brunson initially filed his lawsuit in the Utah 2nd District Court on June 21, 2021, with the goal of proving that, by voting against the proposed investigation into 2020 voter fraud, the defendants violated their sworn oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

After making its way to the Supreme Court, SCOTUS denied Brunson’s petition. On January 23, Brunson filed a petition for reconsideration.

In the petition, Brunson, who is representing himself in the case, argued that the involved lawmakers should face a penalty for violating their oaths of office or else they aren’t binding.

“The Oath of Office requires that aid and comfort cannot be given to those levying war through a rigged election,” wrote Brunson, arguing that a “Presidential rigged election is a threat to the Constitution.”

“[W]hen members of Congress become aware of such allegations an investigation into these allegations is required or they become violators of their Oath of Office,” Brunson added.
.
.
.
https://100percentfedup.com/scotus-to-reconsider-hearing-case-accusing-biden-harris-pence-and-other-lawmakers-violated-oaths-by-ignoring-2020-fraud-allegations/

------------------------------------------------------------

A reference to the law mentioned in the text above:

------------------------------------------------

5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/3331

------------------------------------------------

Quote: DoubleGold

Wouldn't that be something?

------------------------------------------------------

SCOTUS to Reconsider Hearing Case Accusing Biden, Harris, Pence, and Other Lawmakers of Violating Oaths by Ignoring 2020 Fraud Allegations

Feb 16, 2023

The Supreme Court is reconsidering whether to hear a lawsuit filed by Raland J. Brunson that alleges President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, former Vice President Mike Pence, 291 House members, and 94 senators violated their oaths of office by refusing to investigate evidence of fraud in the 2020 election.

Brunson initially filed his lawsuit in the Utah 2nd District Court on June 21, 2021, with the goal of proving that, by voting against the proposed investigation into 2020 voter fraud, the defendants violated their sworn oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

After making its way to the Supreme Court, SCOTUS denied Brunson’s petition. On January 23, Brunson filed a petition for reconsideration.

In the petition, Brunson, who is representing himself in the case, argued that the involved lawmakers should face a penalty for violating their oaths of office or else they aren’t binding.

“The Oath of Office requires that aid and comfort cannot be given to those levying war through a rigged election,” wrote Brunson, arguing that a “Presidential rigged election is a threat to the Constitution.”

“[W]hen members of Congress become aware of such allegations an investigation into these allegations is required or they become violators of their Oath of Office,” Brunson added.
.
.
.
https://100percentfedup.com/scotus-to-reconsider-hearing-case-accusing-biden-harris-pence-and-other-lawmakers-violated-oaths-by-ignoring-2020-fraud-allegations/

------------------------------------------------------------

^^^^

Tell me you know nothing about the Supreme Court without telling me you know nothing about the Supreme Court.

I know it's stacked 6 out of 9.

Quote: DoubleGold

I know it's stacked 6 out of 9.

What are the odds you would give to SCOTUS actually hearing this case?

Quote: ams288

What are the odds you would give to SCOTUS actually hearing this case?

Very low, but possible.

Landmark ruling:

--------------------------------------------------

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, ending 50 years of federal abortion rights

JUN 24 2022

The Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision overturned Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established the constitutional right to abortion.
.
.
.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-overturned-by-supreme-court-ending-federal-abortion-rights.html

----------------------------------------------------

Quote: DoubleGold

Very low, but possible.

I want a number. Gimme a percent. Put your money where your mouth is for once.

Quote: ams288

I want a number. Gimme a percent. Put your money where your mouth is for once.

I'd like to hear your odds first so I have the option, since you brought betting up.

Quote: DoubleGold

I'd like to hear your odds first so I have the option, since you brought betting up.

0%

Quote: ams288

0%

That's funny. LOL


So if I win, are you going to sign everything you have over to me for nothing in return?