Airport reviews

September 11th, 2016 at 3:21:36 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569


Atlanta Airport has announced a 20 year $6 billion master plan to try and maintain it's position as the world's busiest airport (by passengers). The new canopy is the most visible improvement, but there will be a 6th runway, a new 400 room hotel, and a new concourse.


Of course $6 billion over a 20 year period is almost chicken scratch compared to what Mexico is spending on their new airport.

This mural commissioned for the 1996 Olympics will be sacrificed after 20 years, as the wall is to valuable a space for modern video board.


The airport is dominated by Delta who carries 3 out of 4 passengers. It has extensive nonstops to Latin America, Europe, and Johannesburg South Africa, but only flies to Seoul Korea in Asia.
September 11th, 2016 at 4:04:24 PM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
Quote: Pacomartin
But would you rather have old dodgy facilities and massive usage of gates plus cheap flights, or do you want an airport that looks like a shopping mall?
Local politicians would vote for the shopping mall, never realizing people can already go shopping in some seedy area of town near a pervert's movie theater, so why wait on line for a TSA grope? Ship all those burgers out to the airport and charge 23.93 for them and make them burger flippers travel an hour each way and go thru security all the time?

Airports should focus on service windows and turnaround time, not house plants, malls, markets or revenue sources.
September 12th, 2016 at 1:02:09 AM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Fleastiff
Airports should focus on service windows and turnaround time, not house plants, malls, markets or revenue sources.


Looking at FY2014 San Diego airports revenue sources (about $100m Airline and $100m Non airline) we see that terminal concessions are roughly 20% of non airline.

Airline Revenue
$47,761,512 Terminal Building Rentals
$25,776,517 Security Surcharge
$19,107,258 Landing Fees $
$2,503,181 Aircraft Parking Fees
$1,133,839 Common Use Systems
$1,593,918 Other Aviation Revenue
$97,876,224 Total Airline Revenue

Non-Airline Revenue
$36,424,594 Parking Revenue
$24,900,830 Rental Car License
$18,798,533 Terminal Concessions
$8,445,275 Ground Rentals
$4,070,505 License Fees Other
$2,534,428 Ground Tansportation Permits
$1,157,565 Terminal Rent Non-Airline
$1,160,501 Other Operating Revenue
$368,385 Grant Reimbursements
$97,860,616 Total Non-Airline Revenue
September 27th, 2016 at 12:49:30 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
DJT took a major shot at the airports in USA during the first debate last night.

Quote: Donald Trump
Our airports are like from a third world country. You land at LaGuardia, you land at Kennedy, you land at LAX, you land at Newark, and you come in from Dubai and Qatar and you see these incredible -- you come in from China, you see these incredible airports, and you land -- we've become a third world country.


Obviously Denver (February 1995) or probably DFW (September 1973) can handle traffic into the 21st century, but with Mexico, Turkey, Beijing and Dubai building massive new airports we should consider doing something.
Quote: FORBES Jason Rabinowitz , DEC 2, 2014
The poor state of New York City area airports is no secret. Every year, John F. Kennedy Airport, LaGuardia Airport, and Newark Airport combine for the trifecta of worst ranked airports on a global scale. To help elevate the regions dismal airports from worst to first, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has tasked the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to host a contest seeking fresh ideas for new airport master plans. The comprehensive master plans look to address passenger needs from 2050 and beyond, encompassing everything from better transit access, baggage handling, to cargo operations, to infrastructure, and much more.

Around the world, airport mega hubs in cities like Dubai in United Arab Emirates and Doha in Qatar have become economic powerhouses, leaving airports in the United States behind in the dust. Through the creation of a new master plan, the Port Authority hopes to put itself in a position to better compete.

Most interestingly, the design competition for JFK asks competitors to incorporate an “Aerotropolis,” or “Airport City,” into the plan. This concept calls for office complexes, conference and training centers, medical facilities, along with additional industrial and warehousing facilities in addition to traditional airport fixtures. This plan is nothing short of ambitious, clearly setting Dubai’s new World Central airport and others like it square in its sights. However, there would be significant hurdles in building anything along those lines in New York.
...

Up to three designs will be selected by the Port Authority for further consideration, and the due date of January 30, 2015 is rapidly approaching. While John F. Kennedy and Laguardia Airports will probably never compete with foreign mega hubs or see an aerotropolis realized, improvements are desperately needed, and these master plans may just be what gets it done.
September 27th, 2016 at 1:31:16 PM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: Pacomartin
DJT took a major shot at the airports in USA during the first debate last night.


But is he going to make the Emiratis, Qataris and Chinese pay for our airports?


Quote:
Obviously Denver (February 1995) or probably DFW (September 1973) can handle traffic into the 21st century, but with Mexico, Turkey, Beijing and Dubai building massive new airports we should consider doing something.


I'm seeing the Boeing problem all over again: something designed for one thing cannot be appropriately modified to do another.

But what is the complaint? Transit times, delays, crowding, facilities, wasted time, security lines, safety? One thing about the average American, and not a bad thing, is they care a great deal about value for money. It's what's gotten air travel to be what it is today: cheap. And almost every other consideration is secondary or irrelevant.

If you come up with a way to give JFK, for example, a makeover that will make it look, feel and work like, for instance, Schiphol (a consistently highly ranked airport), then you'd better include a very, very low price tag. Otherwise it will be a non-starter.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
September 27th, 2016 at 1:38:36 PM permalink
kenarman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 14
Posts: 4530
Trump probably has a point when Denver at 28th is the top rated US airport as listed on the customer nominated world airport awards.
"but if you make yourselves sheep, the wolves will eat you." Benjamin Franklin
September 27th, 2016 at 2:06:36 PM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: kenarman
Trump probably has a point when Denver at 28th is the top rated US airport as listed on the customer nominated world airport awards.

2016 - Airport - 2015 ranking
1 Singapore Changi 1
2 Incheon Intl Airport 2
3 Munich Airport 3
4 Tokyo Intl Haneda 5
5 Hong Kong Intl Airport 4
6 Centrair Airport 7
7 Zurich Airport 6
8 London Heathrow 8
9 Kansai Intl Airport 12
10 Doha Hamad Airport 22
...
28 Denver Airport 33
32 Cincinnati/Kentucky 30
37 San Francisco Airport 36
43 Hartsfield-Jackson 44
54 Seattle-Tacoma 54
58 Dallas/Fort Worth 62
59 New York JFK Airport 60
71 Houston George Bush 101
75 Minneapolis-St Paul 86
89 Detroit Airport 96
91 Los Angeles Airport 98
97 Boston Logan Airport 88

It isn't that much of a stretch to ding on NYC airports as they are widely considered overcrowded, messy and outdated.

CVG is the second highest rated airport, and highest last year. Commercial service only began January 1947, so it isn't as old as most airports.Plus it lost 72% of it's passenger load over a decade from 2005-2015 . So naturally it seems roomy and I am sure that delays are minimal.

Quote: Nareed
If you come up with a way to give JFK, for example, a makeover that will make it look, feel and work like, for instance, Schiphol (a consistently highly ranked airport), then you'd better include a very, very low price tag. Otherwise it will be a non-starter.


Nareed is correct in saying that people want lots of inexpensive choices, not necessarily beauty . We also don't have a national airport (even Dulles has not been a national airport in decades). They are locally run and they all have to pay for themselves. Airports like Dubai are paid for by the kingdom.

We have the "big four" which collectively have 19.2% of the nation's air traffic ATL, LAX, ORD, and DFW but JFK, MIA and LAX dominate in international traffic. I have advocated building a floating runway for LAX to handle the larger noisy jets, but it would probably be a nightmare to get by the California Coastal Commission.

Floating runway proposed for London's Thames estuary.


Ideas to build a new runway at JFK have surfaced, but I have yet to see a real Aerotropolis design.
September 28th, 2016 at 7:31:26 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: Pacomartin
Nareed is correct in saying that people want lots of inexpensive choices, not necessarily beauty .


I think if you could get rid of, or severely reduce, security lines, and make airports more compact so you don't have to walk too much to get to your plane, most passengers would be satisfied.

MEX's Terminal 2 is rather compact. You can see most gates from the center. I don't see how it could be made more compact without reducing the number of gates. IN fact, this was the rationale for satellite-type terminals (T2 is in what I call finger-style, rather fractal). McCarran's new T3 is a long, long rectangle. It's not so bad because it's not very big. MEX's T1 is big, and catching a flight at the far end can involve upwards of a mile's walk.

All this would involve tearing down and rebuilding terminals. That costs money.

As for security lines, that involves tackling the infinite inertia of bureaucratic procedures. Good luck with that! Veteran travelers can speed things up some, but only some. For example, You could empty your pockets into your laptop bag or carry-on before getting in line, wear shoes that don't require laces, and forego a belt for the trip, or put it in the bag also. Grab two trays, place your bag and jacket in one, and your laptop, shoes and cell on the other. Then you'll get stuck behind the noob who thinks emptying their pockets doesn't include removing spare change, and doesn't believe in removing their shoes.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER
September 28th, 2016 at 10:21:19 AM permalink
Pacomartin
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 1068
Posts: 12569
Quote: Nareed
As for security lines, that involves tackling the infinite inertia of bureaucratic procedures. Good luck with that! Veteran travelers can speed things up some, but only some. For example, You could empty your pockets into your laptop bag or carry-on before getting in line, wear shoes that don't require laces, and forego a belt for the trip, or put it in the bag also. Grab two trays, place your bag and jacket in one, and your laptop, shoes and cell on the other. Then you'll get stuck behind the noob who thinks emptying their pockets doesn't include removing spare change, and doesn't believe in removing their shoes.


For anyone who travels at least once a year, the $85 for 5 years is certainly worth the money.
Quote: TSA

https://www.tsa.gov/precheck
Keep moving. TSA Pre✓® saves you time and stress.
With a 5 year, $85 membership, you can speed through security and don’t need to remove your:
shoes, laptops, liquids, belts and light jackets.
September 28th, 2016 at 10:51:09 AM permalink
Nareed
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 346
Posts: 12545
Quote: Pacomartin
For anyone who travels at least once a year, the $85 for 5 years is certainly worth the money.


I'd say for once a year it's not worth it at all. It would be $17 on top of every roundtrip fare. To me, that's pricy.

Also, it's not available on every airport or at every time, at least according to my reading of aviation blogs. And if you forget to add it on booking, or the travel or airline site screws up and doesn't add it to your ticket, you can't use it.

But if you travel several times per year to different places, then it's worth it.

The problem is that it shouldn't be necessary. About 90% of what the TSA does is really pointless ritual.
Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER