Trump 2025

July 24th, 2025 at 4:52:07 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: PotPie
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Hilarious, if true. Because of Trump winning the immunity ruling from SCOTU7S, Obama can't EVEN be prosecuted even if he's technically guilty which is unlikely anyway.

Stupid MAGA.


How do you figure that?


from the link:

"Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch."

wanna make the claim that looking into it was not an "official act" - that's an extreme longshot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States


So in your world making a fake dossier is an “official act?”
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
July 24th, 2025 at 5:02:24 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22944
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: PotPie
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Hilarious, if true. Because of Trump winning the immunity ruling from SCOTU7S, Obama can't EVEN be prosecuted even if he's technically guilty which is unlikely anyway.

Stupid MAGA.


How do you figure that?


from the link:

"Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch."

wanna make the claim that looking into it was not an "official act" - that's an extreme longshot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States


So in your world making a fake dossier is an “official act?”


Simple, a research intelligence document can have false information among good information because plenty can't be aboslutely verified but still might be true.

For instance, people had to make an assessment on the strike of Iran. If they got it some of it wrong that's just part of the process. Someone shows lots of Russian connections, and a judgment had to be made.

Look at all the smoke in these charts, there must be a fire. You'd have to be a fool not to suspect something.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/03/connections-trump-putin-russia-ties-chart-flynn-page-manafort-sessions-214868/
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.
July 24th, 2025 at 5:08:01 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: rxwine
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: PotPie
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Hilarious, if true. Because of Trump winning the immunity ruling from SCOTU7S, Obama can't EVEN be prosecuted even if he's technically guilty which is unlikely anyway.

Stupid MAGA.


How do you figure that?


from the link:

"Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch."

wanna make the claim that looking into it was not an "official act" - that's an extreme longshot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States


So in your world making a fake dossier is an “official act?”


Simple, a research intelligence document can have false information among good information because plenty can't be aboslutely verified but still might be true.


Unless it is a fabrication and not research like in this case.

Nice try but I you boy Obama had better have a better defense.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
July 24th, 2025 at 5:42:51 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22944
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: PotPie
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Hilarious, if true. Because of Trump winning the immunity ruling from SCOTU7S, Obama can't EVEN be prosecuted even if he's technically guilty which is unlikely anyway.

Stupid MAGA.


How do you figure that?


from the link:

"Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch."

wanna make the claim that looking into it was not an "official act" - that's an extreme longshot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States


So in your world making a fake dossier is an “official act?”




Simple, a research intelligence document can have false information among good information because plenty can't be aboslutely verified but still might be true.


Unless it is a fabrication and not research like in this case.

Nice try but I you boy Obama had better have a better defense.


Nope, and on top of the that no one thinks he can be convicted. You already lost before you started.
"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.
July 24th, 2025 at 6:09:26 AM permalink
PotPie
Member since: Oct 9, 2022
Threads: 11
Posts: 550
Quote: rxwine

Nope, and on top of the that no one thinks he can be convicted. You already lost before you started.

correct

Bondi might indict him

she's a reprehensible boot licking sycophant who will do Trump's bidding no matter how bizarre or ridiculous his claims are

but get a conviction____? - not a chance in hell

.
the foolish sayings of a rich man pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
July 24th, 2025 at 6:18:10 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 137
Posts: 21195
Quote: rxwine
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: PotPie
Quote: AZDuffman
Quote: rxwine
Hilarious, if true. Because of Trump winning the immunity ruling from SCOTU7S, Obama can't EVEN be prosecuted even if he's technically guilty which is unlikely anyway.

Stupid MAGA.


How do you figure that?


from the link:

"Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that Congress cannot regulate such as the pardon, command of the military, execution of laws, or control of the executive branch."

wanna make the claim that looking into it was not an "official act" - that's an extreme longshot

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States


So in your world making a fake dossier is an “official act?”


Don’t need a conviction to “win.” Just prove he did it. Same as OJ everyone will know.



Simple, a research intelligence document can have false information among good information because plenty can't be aboslutely verified but still might be true.


Unless it is a fabrication and not research like in this case.

Nice try but I you boy Obama had better have a better defense.


Nope, and on top of the that no one thinks he can be convicted. You already lost before you started.
War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength
July 24th, 2025 at 6:35:49 AM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 217
Posts: 22944
Besides there's more interesting stuff and he's not an ex-president.

"Trumpsplain (def.) explaining absolute nonsense said by TRUMP.
July 24th, 2025 at 8:22:18 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4245
Whistleblowers coming out of the woodwork according to Gabbard:


I've studied Trump's actions.

When he acts, it's an orchestrated plan.

Otherwise, he holds-off until a specific time.


Watch what Trump has released next.

Hussein's goose is cooked.


Gabbard quote with Bartiroma:


--------------------

I will do all that I can. We have whistleblowers, actually, Maria, coming forward now after we release these documents, because there are people who were around—who were working within the intelligence community at this time—who were so disgusted by what happened. We’re starting to see some of them come out of the woodwork here because they, too, like you and I and the American people, want to see justice delivered.

We’re going to provide everything that we have—everything that we will continue to gather—to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose. There must be indictments. Those responsible, no matter how powerful they are or were at that time, no matter who was involved in creating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people—they all must be held accountable.

--------------------


Cruz quotes with Ingram:


Ted Cruz: Russia Hoax ‘About Subverting Democracy’ — ‘They Were Mad’ About Donald Trump

24 Jul 2025
.
.
.
INGRAHAM: Senator, are we going to actually see people held accountable here?

CRUZ: Look, I hope and pray that we do, and I hope that the Justice Department fully investigates this. What’s critical that Tulsi Gabbard made public is not that that people put out allegations that Putin wanted Trump to win. It’s that they were lying and knew they were lying. That’s what’s explosive here, is that their repeated testimony to Congress was false. And you go through some of the facts that Tulsi put out. So, August 31, 2016, a DHS official tells former DNI James Clapper that there was, quote, no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count. That’s what they’re saying in August 2016.

September 2, 2016, the FBI said it was, quote, uncomfortable implying that there was definitive information that Russia intends to disrupt our elections. September 9, the intelligence community concluded that, quote, Russia was probably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means. September 12th, same thing. December 7, December 7, after the election, here was Clapper’s talking points written, quote, foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on an election infrastructure to alter the U.S. presidential election outcome.

December 8, Obama’s presidential daily briefing. Here’s what it said, quote, we assess that Russian and criminal actors did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure. So, all the way up to December 8, over and over and over again, they say, no, Russia, no Russia, no Russia. And then December 9, December 9, there’s a meeting with DNI Director Clapper with National Security Advisor Susan Rice, with Secretary of State John Kerry, and with Deputy FBI Director McCabe, in which they reversed their positions altogether. And they all come out to say, Russia, Russia, Russia. That’s why Trump got elected.

And I’ll tell you this December 9 meeting, FDR famously said December 7th is a date that will live in infamy. Well, December 9 should be a day that will live in infamy, because this is a moment when senior members of our government decided to lie to the American people and to sabotage President Donald Trump, who had just been elected by the American people.

INGRAHAM: In a CNN interview back in 2018, former DNI Chief Clapper admitted something about Obama. Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JAMES CLAPPER, FORMER DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE: If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation. President Obama is responsible for that and it was he, who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

INGRAHAM: No, he wasn’t admitting that it was all false, but he said it was Obama. This was after the entire intel community had, as you read, made their assessments, which are always changing. They’re always, you know, their assessments, they’re not — there never can be definitive conclusions. But the indication was Russia wasn’t, according to even what Obama said yesterday, he’s still lying.

CRUZ: And they suddenly erased everything they had been saying for months, and they reversed 180 degrees.

INGRAHAM: Was it Obama’s statement yesterday a lie, when he said Russia, Russia was trying — it didn’t indicate that in the intel assessments.

CRUZ: It didn’t indicate that, but — but listen, Barack Obama is profoundly partisan. The people around him, they are hardcore radicals. John Brennan, who ran the CIA. Do you know he voted for in 1976? He voted for Gus Hall. Gus Hall was the Communist Party nominee to be president because John Brennan said Jimmy Carter, who was running in 1976 is not liberal enough for John Brennan. He wanted a communist. And by the way, he’s admitted to this, he voted for the communist. He wanted a communist President of the United States.

Well, fast forward to Barack Obama and his wish came true, and understand these partisans are so contemptuous of the American people, what was the Russia hoax about? It was about subverting democracy. They were mad at the voters that they elected Donald Trump.

INGRAHAM: They want to punish them.

CRUZ: It’s the exact same sentiment that led to the lawfare last year of indicting Donald Trump four times. That ultimately was not about their hatred for Trump. It was about their contempt for the voters. They wanted to stop the American people from reelecting them, reelecting President Trump, and that contempt for the voters is manifestly through this willingness to lie to Congress and lie to the American people.
.
.
.
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/07/24/ted-cruz-russia-hoax-about-subverting-democracy-they-were-mad-about-donald-trump/


Hussein fictitiously getting arrested on video:


Obama AI Video | Trump Shares Video Of Barack Obama Getting Arrested, But There's A Catch To It
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnPm_vgZPiE
July 24th, 2025 at 11:33:21 AM permalink
PotPie
Member since: Oct 9, 2022
Threads: 11
Posts: 550
Gabbard is a lying boot licking sycophantic bag of excrement whose grand scheme is sure to fail - one way or another

Trump's clownish fake videos of Obama show what a buffoon he is

AS IF anyone with at least half a brain didn't already know that by now

.
the foolish sayings of a rich man pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
July 24th, 2025 at 11:40:49 AM permalink
DoubleGold
Member since: Jan 26, 2023
Threads: 34
Posts: 4245
Supposedly, Trump was the Epstein whistleblower in 2005:

He also has a history of working undercover for the FBI (I already posted the references).


Trump has always been a white hat.

Although, I can find some negative Chabad references that aren't easily discernible.









It'll take awhile to get over the Mockingbird brainwashing.

It'd be normal to get angry.

I'd guess about 10 years.


If you noticed, one by one the Mockingbird is being decimated, fined, losing court cases, taken off-air, etc.

There's no doubt the Democrats and Rinos were scammed.


If I had to compare the two, the Rinos are 10x worse.

I think of the Rinos as traitors, like McCain, Romney, Cheney, Ryan, Pence, etc.

The Democrats are different.