Trump 2025

Quote:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Friday, Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard revealed overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how, after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his national security cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President Trump.

-In the months leading up to the November 2016 election, the Intelligence Community (IC) consistently assessed that Russia is “probably not trying … to influence the election by using cyber means.”

-On December 7, 2016, after the election, talking points were prepared for DNI James Clapper stating, “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome.”

-On December 9, 2016, President Obama’s White House gathered top National Security Council Principals for a meeting that included James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and others, to discuss Russia.

-After the meeting, DNI Clapper’s Executive Assistant sent an email to IC leaders tasking them with creating a new IC assessment “per the President’s request” that details the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.” It went on to say, “ODNI will lead this effort with participation from CIA, FBI, NSA, and DHS.”

-Obama officials leaked false statements to media outlets, including The Washington Post, claiming, “Russia has attempted through cyber means to interfere in, if not actively influence, the outcome of an election.”

-On January 6, 2017, a new Intelligence Community Assessment was released that directly contradicted the IC assessments that were made throughout the previous six months.

Quote: PotPie

.
former Trump supporters burned Maga hats because they're unhappy about his handling of the Epstein files

I love it______________________________(-:}





https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/17/trump-jeffrey-epstein-republicans-maga


.

Quote:

President Donald Trump's legal team made several grave errors in their new $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp and Rupert Murdoch, according to an attorney who specializes in First Amendment law.

In a thread posted to his X account Friday, Atlanta, Georgia-based lawyer Andrew Fleischman predicted that Trump's lawsuit will be promptly thrown out due to multiple glaring issues. Chiefly, Trump filed the lawsuit in federal court in the Southern District of Florida. While he may have done so as a means of drawing U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon — the Trump appointee who officially scuttled former DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith's classified documents case against Trump last July — Fleischman pointed out that Florida has an anti-SLAPP statute [Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation] that will doom Trump's litigation.

Florida's libel and defamation laws also require that plaintiffs give defendants at least five days' notice that they plan to sue them before officially submitting the filing in court. According to Fleischman, Trump "made that impossible" by suing the Journal just a day after the paper published its bombshell report about a lewd birthday message Trump allegedly sent Epstein in 2003.

"The remedy is dismissal," Fleischman tweeted. "And I suspect that means Trump pays the WSJ's legal fees."

"That's not the only big problem with the lawsuit," he continued in a subsequent tweet. "But it's the one that an 11 year old with a Lexis subscription could figure out in 5 minutes."

Quote: rxwine

Quote:

President Donald Trump's legal team made several grave errors in their new $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp and Rupert Murdoch, according to an attorney who specializes in First Amendment law.

In a thread posted to his X account Friday, Atlanta, Georgia-based lawyer Andrew Fleischman predicted that Trump's lawsuit will be promptly thrown out due to multiple glaring issues. Chiefly, Trump filed the lawsuit in federal court in the Southern District of Florida. While he may have done so as a means of drawing U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon — the Trump appointee who officially scuttled former DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith's classified documents case against Trump last July — Fleischman pointed out that Florida has an anti-SLAPP statute [Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation] that will doom Trump's litigation.

Florida's libel and defamation laws also require that plaintiffs give defendants at least five days' notice that they plan to sue them before officially submitting the filing in court. According to Fleischman, Trump "made that impossible" by suing the Journal just a day after the paper published its bombshell report about a lewd birthday message Trump allegedly sent Epstein in 2003.

"The remedy is dismissal," Fleischman tweeted. "And I suspect that means Trump pays the WSJ's legal fees."

"That's not the only big problem with the lawsuit," he continued in a subsequent tweet. "But it's the one that an 11 year old with a Lexis subscription could figure out in 5 minutes."

Quote: rxwine

Quote:

President Donald Trump's legal team made several grave errors in their new $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp and Rupert Murdoch, according to an attorney who specializes in First Amendment law.

In a thread posted to his X account Friday, Atlanta, Georgia-based lawyer Andrew Fleischman predicted that Trump's lawsuit will be promptly thrown out due to multiple glaring issues. Chiefly, Trump filed the lawsuit in federal court in the Southern District of Florida. While he may have done so as a means of drawing U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon — the Trump appointee who officially scuttled former DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith's classified documents case against Trump last July — Fleischman pointed out that Florida has an anti-SLAPP statute [Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation] that will doom Trump's litigation.

Florida's libel and defamation laws also require that plaintiffs give defendants at least five days' notice that they plan to sue them before officially submitting the filing in court. According to Fleischman, Trump "made that impossible" by suing the Journal just a day after the paper published its bombshell report about a lewd birthday message Trump allegedly sent Epstein in 2003.

"The remedy is dismissal," Fleischman tweeted. "And I suspect that means Trump pays the WSJ's legal fees."

"That's not the only big problem with the lawsuit," he continued in a subsequent tweet. "But it's the one that an 11 year old with a Lexis subscription could figure out in 5 minutes."

Quote: missedhervee

What will happen when and if, as seems to be expected, it is revealed via dissemination of Epstein lists / tapes / CD-R's that Don the Con was in on the "fun?"

Gotta wonder too: how many folks had Epstein secretly recorded and then blackmailed?

Was Trump a victim?

This truly is becoming "the gift that keeps on giving..."

*sips coffee, pets cat*