Abortion

Quote: AZDuffman

You probably don’t know. You think guys can be women by saying they are.

You're the guy who wants to check out people in the bathroom, not me. You can't do a chromosome test on them, so you're just going to have be a peeper.

Quote: rxwine

You're the guy who wants to check out people in the bathroom, not me. You can't do a chromosome test on them, so you're just going to have be a peeper.

I’m not checking anyone out. You are the one who proved you watch tranny porn right here so I’m not the one with issues.

Quote: AZDuffman

I’m not checking anyone out. You are the one who proved you watch tranny porn right here so I’m not the one with issues.

You didn't believe men slept with transexual women, and you've been complaining ever since I showed you proof. You don't like FACTS.

Quote: AZDuffman

People who support perverts in women’s bathrooms and sports have zero standing to say they support wonen in anything.

And yes that means all the left wingers here.

Duffy and is MAGA friends want to "protect" biological women so they can use them purely as breeding stock.

Quote: GenoDRPh

Duffy and is MAGA friends want to "protect" biological women so they can use them purely as breeding stock.

You keep posting the same childish stupid post.

As someone who is 100% pro abortion rights, I at least can understand that someone who believes that upon conception the embryo/fetus is a human being deserving protection like us already born does not consider women to be broodmares. What they want to protect is the unborn child.

You can argue, like most Americans agree with, that until the fetus is viable it does not share the same rights as you or I do, and can be terminated solely on the request of the mother to be. But saying someone who thinks different from you considers women breeding stock is amongst your stupider points, and that is saying something….

Quote: SOOPOO

But saying someone who thinks different from you considers women breeding stock is amongst your stupider points, and that is saying something….

Nice

I am fundamentally against abortion but then again, when I look at the demographics of who gets abortions, how can I realistically be against it. It's a conundrum, it's a quandary.

Everyone for abortion wasn't aborted.

It's a one-sided argument.

Zero exceptions.

Quote: SOOPOO

I at least can understand that someone who believes that upon conception the embryo/fetus is a human being deserving protection like us already born does not consider women to be broodmares. What they want to protect is the unborn child.

OK, but what then does that make the woman who is unwilling to go full term?

A "brood mare."

Sorry doc, but you cannot have one without the other.

Quote: SOOPOO

You keep posting the same childish stupid post.

As someone who is 100% pro abortion rights, I at least can understand that someone who believes that upon conception the embryo/fetus is a human being deserving protection like us already born does not consider women to be broodmares. What they want to protect is the unborn child.

You can argue, like most Americans agree with, that until the fetus is viable it does not share the same rights as you or I do, and can be terminated solely on the request of the mother to be. But saying someone who thinks different from you considers women breeding stock is amongst your stupider points, and that is saying something….

That's the conclusion I draw, SooPoo. What other conclusion is there? GOP sponsored laws targeting abortion prioritize fetal health over maternal health, even in cases of severe complications or in utero fetal death where stillbirth is the only outcome. What have you to say about those cases? The GOP demands women carry pregnancies to term, even if such pregnancy or delivery is dangerous to the gravid.

If you think it's childish to advocate pro-choice, just keep on scrolling,, amigo.