Non-man (formerly known as woman)

I know it’s not kosher to used the word “retarded” anymore, but anyone who TRULY believes that Michelle Obama is a man is a straight up retard.

Quote: DoubleGold

I just saw one a little while ago looking at something else.

She was young and looked like a man.

Flat chest and all.

Short hair.

Oh, really?

Please post it.

Meanwhile, I'll post this pic of her in high school, to dash, dismember and destroy your tinker-toy brain fart.

Yes.

There should be one of her pregnant.

Post one of those.


I don't feel comfortable posting a pic of someone else in a negative context.

You're posting a pic in a positive context.

Quote: DoubleGold

There should be one of her pregnant. Post one of those.

Here's several: https://www.tiktok.com/discover/michelle-obama-pregnancy-photos?lang=en

Quote: missedhervee

Here's several: https://www.tiktok.com/discover/michelle-obama-pregnancy-photos?lang=en

Did you read the comments of each one?

Quote: ams288

I know it’s not kosher to used the word “retarded” anymore, but anyone who TRULY believes that Michelle Obama is a man is a straight up retard.

I wish there were lie detectors that were dependable. I’d bet the VAST MAJORITY of the dodos that claim MO is a man would come up as lying. Just pushing the stupidity for some bizarre political reason. I’m not sure which group are stupider…. MO is a man claimants, or 2020 election deniers? I think the MO is a man group are more deranged.

When the Obama birther movement became established, I didn't think much of it.

I thought it was an interesting story, how a man could rise to become the President of the USA like Obama did.

That's an amazing feat.



So the focus was on Obama's birth certificate, to make sure he was a naturalized citizen to qualify as becoming a President.

Now the focus seems to be on his wife's birth certificate to determine sex, possibly to prevent her from becoming President.

Also, their children's birth certificates, as opposed to being adopted, because Michelle stated she had a miscarriage and then had IVF (in-vitro fertilization).



So the story is interesting.

So far, I see no scientific evidence either way.

I'll continue to read with interest.



If Michelle enters the race, she could sweep the elections.

But not sure if she'd have to produce the certificates.

Both would be amazing feats.

Quote: DoubleGold

So far, I see no scientific evidence either way.

For that matter, I've seen no "scientific evidence" that Trump isn't a Manchurian candidate, nor that he has a functioning brain.

"Scientific evidence:" that's a good one.

Quote: DoubleGold

When the Obama birther movement became established, I didn't think much of it.

I thought it was an interesting story, how a man could rise to become the President of the USA like Obama did.

That's an amazing feat.



So the focus was on Obama's birth certificate, to make sure he was a naturalized citizen to qualify as becoming a President.

Now the focus seems to be on his wife's birth certificate to determine sex, possibly to prevent her from becoming President.

Also, their children's birth certificates, as opposed to being adopted, because Michelle stated she had a miscarriage and then had IVF (in-vitro fertilization).



So the story is interesting.

So far, I see no scientific evidence either way.

I'll continue to read with interest.



If Michelle enters the race, she could sweep the elections.

But not sure if she'd have to produce the certificates.

Both would be amazing feats.

What does this even mean? This is such a strange post.

Let's assume she was born a man, how would that disqualify her from the Presidency? (By the way she was clearly born a woman, this is an unhinged conspiracy).

As for the BCs of children? Who cares even if some of them were adopted, how is this an issue? McCain had adopted some of his kids.... This is not an unheard-of thing.

As for the focus on Obama's BC, that was only for one reason.... Nobody serious thought that he was not a naturalized citizen. McCain was actually born in Panama and nobody cared about his BC.

And so what if she had a miscarriage and used IVF? Also, not an uncommon thing for many women.

There are only three things in the USC that disqualify somebody from being President, being under 35, not being a naturalized citizen, and living in the U.S. under 14 years. There are some additional disqualifications in subsequent amendments (such as exceeding term limits and getting barred from elected office and public trusts a result of certain crimes). However, being trans, adopting kids, even getting IVF are not disqualifications in any world.

https://www.usa.gov/requirements-for-presidential-candidates

Quote: missedhervee

For that matter, I've seen no "scientific evidence" that Trump isn't a Manchurian candidate, nor that he has a functioning brain.

"Scientific evidence:" that's a good one.

There has been no debate about any other President's sex before, to my knowledge.

Like if Gavin Newsom ran for President of the USA for the Communist Party.

We'd assume he was credible.


But these days are different, especially after seeing videos of Michelle packing.

Scientific or not, she looks like she's packing.


It's OK to reverse pack and become a President, but be credible about it.