Non-man (formerly known as woman)

Quote: kenarman

The gay flag breaks the law as does almost everything the Biden administration does. The 'LAW' (not a suggestion) states that if other flags are flown next to the US flag that the US flag must be the highest and be in the most prominent position.

Shocking kenarman fell for fake news again! /s

(There was a US flag above the pride flag on top of the WH - no laws were broken. Right wing media just cropped it out of their images to rile up the rubes)

Quote: odiousgambit

I knew you were getting bored with the google/people ask bit and all that

Got sick of reading your desperate copy and paste “justification” for your hatred.

The Pride Flag hung at the White House.

The post is from a Kansas ex-Senator.


It could be the admin thinks the flag represents people that are weak in some way.

Like there is something wrong with them (handicap?).


Not sure why the admin would think that way.

But if they were handicapped, they need to include all the handicapped persons.

------------------------------

Dr. Roger Marshall

Jun 11, 2023

This is a disgrace.

Not only is it in breach of US Flag Code, but it’s a glaring example of this White Houses’ incompetence and insistence on putting their social agenda ahead of patriotism.

https://twitter.com/RogerMarshallMD/status/1667942869519269890

------------------------------

Quote: ams288

Got sick of reading your desperate copy and paste “justification” for your hatred.

you know you are fitting the pattern of pouncing on anyone who even meekly protests the 'brave new world' and calling them a racist or homophobe or a hater or whatever.

That women are no longer to be called women, but non-man persons, is pretty out there ... you might think even someone pretty invested in gay rights and such might think "you know what, that's pretty nuts, and I can't support every nutty idea". You might. But instead it's the old pattern of knee-jerk reaction

Quote: odiousgambit

you know you are fitting the pattern of pouncing on anyone who even meekly protests the 'brave new world' and calling them a racist or homophobe or a hater or whatever.

That women are no longer to be called women, but non-man persons, is pretty out there ... you might think even someone pretty invested in gay rights and such might think "you know what, that's pretty nuts, and I can't support every nutty idea". You might. But instead it's the old pattern of knee-jerk reaction

I have no intention to start referring to women as non-men. I doubt anyone in the real world actually does. It’ll take more than a tweet from JK Rowling to convince me that this is a thing.

Quote: ams288

I have no intention to start referring to women as non-men. I doubt anyone in the real world actually does. It’ll take more than a tweet from JK Rowling to convince me that this is a thing.

I'll give you a synopsis of the Piers Morgan article

Quote: edited

Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.... decided this week to unilaterally redefine the word “lesbian” to be “more inclusive.”

In its official online glossary of LGBTQ+ terminology, it said a lesbian was “a non-man attracted to non-men.”

... this updated definition includes non-binary people who may also identify with this label...

[assertions follow that all this new renaming in medical usage has been generally anti-women, such as the usage 'birthing person']

... All this is supposedly done to cause less offense to transgender or non-binary people who don’t wish to be called women.

so it's not originating with JK Rowling

that article again, https://nypost.com/2023/06/14/john-hopkins-non-man-attracted-to-non-men-nonsense-is-an-insult-to-women/

Quote: odiousgambit

That women are no longer to be called women, but non-man persons,

What planet do you live on?????
Seriously
You are going nuts over a fantasy in your head
To think people will not use the term "woman" is very very very out there.

Quote: terapined

What planet do you live on?????
Seriously
You are going nuts over a fantasy in your head
To think people will not use the term "woman" is very very very out there.

don't try to get a job at John Hopkins, Caveman!

Also, I wouldn't advise taking a sick child to John Hopkins neither, like my niece did.

The child died.



Apparently, she married an Argentina man and got pregnant.

The first was healthy but the second wasn't.

The issue was not something out of our blood line, because no other relatives have had it.


My niece is a physician assistant too, so she likely believes all the fake stuff there.

Quote: odiousgambit

don't try to get a job at John Hopkins, Caveman!

I have no doubt people at Hopkins are using the term "woman"
Your thinking is so illogically stupid
You converse with lefties here that are all using the term "woman" and twist it all up in your fantasy to claim the term is being changed.
My nephew works at Hopkins
He uses the term "woman"
You can't deal with reality that the left here uses the term "woman". 99.9999999999999999999% of the left uses the term "woman"
Odious only listens to the .000000000000000001% on the left and then makes absurd declarations
99.999999999% of schools use the term "woman"
Odious ignores that.
Crazy, illogical and dumb
You look for anything to feed your disgusting hatred of gays and trans