The Coronavirus thread

Tweet by Robert Malone in regards to life insurance data coming out.

If you click on Ed Dowd's embedded thread, there is more info.

------------------------------------------

Bad news building. Get CPR certified. See a physician and make sure your heart is in good condition. And even that may not be enough.

https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1630933743136391168?cxt=HHwWgIC-vaXmnqItAAAA

-----------------------------------------

Quote: DoubleGold

Tweet by Robert Malone in regards to life insurance data coming out.

If you click on Ed Dowd's embedded thread, there is more info.

------------------------------------------

Bad news building. Get CPR certified. See a physician and make sure your heart is in good condition. And even that may not be enough.

https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/1630933743136391168?cxt=HHwWgIC-vaXmnqItAAAA

-----------------------------------------

You just said this:

Quote:

All science is no longer credible because of a virus that can't be scientifically proven that killed 15M people.

So you can't use something you said doesn't work to prove anything. Too bad. So sad.

!

I stand by my comment.

Science is not credible.

But that doesn't mean we quit learning nor give up.

It means be smarter to compensate for science shortcomings.

Quote: DoubleGold

I stand by my comment.

Science is not credible.

But that doesn't mean we quit learning nor give up.

It means be smarter to compensate for science shortcomings.

Horsecrappy.

You also have complained before about fear mongering doctors reporting stats on deaths during the pandemic But when your post suggest some link for unusual deaths due to the virus, it's is what?

Keep being a hypocrite. Or stop. You decide.

Quote: DoubleGold

I stand by my comment.

Science is not credible.

But that doesn't mean we quit learning nor give up.

It means be smarter to compensate for science shortcomings.

How is science not credible? By definition science is self-correcting. Science is the most credible way of looking at anything.

Quote: rxwine

Horsecrappy.

You also have complained before about fear mongering doctors reporting stats on deaths during the pandemic But when your post suggest some link for unusual deaths due to the virus, it's is what?

Keep being a hypocrite. Or stop. You decide.

I’m starting to think he is a poorly coded AI program.

Quote: ams288

I’m starting to think he is a poorly coded AI program.

You know, I have been on the verge several times of saying it might be more fun talking with a chatbot.

Quote: rxwine

Horsecrappy.

You also have complained before about fear mongering doctors reporting stats on deaths during the pandemic But when your post suggest some link for unusual deaths due to the virus, it's is what?

Keep being a hypocrite. Or stop. You decide.

There is no such thing as a virus.

http://diversitytomorrow.com/thread/3150/885/#post197960


That info I posted from Ed Dowd, is related to the excess deaths from group life policies.

I understand you're having a hard time grasping what fake science is.

You are not to blame.


Fake science is similar to fake news.


The news is an interpretation of the data of events.

The so called authority are not to be trusted.

It doesn't necessarily mean the event didn't happen.

It's the interpretation of an event.

So an interpretation by CNN might claim the Earth is flat.

And another by the Holy Bible might claim the Earth is circular.

But we don't have to sentence Galileo to death for claiming the Earth was circular.


Same way with science.

The science is an interpretation.

When politics, power, and authority are combined, then science is no longer science.

It's fake science.


We can see this clearly with "climate change" and the left of center scientists.


I was reading an article about Flat Earth.

About 16% of folks in the USA believe the Earth is flat.

There's a reason for that large number.

It's because we know we are constantly being deceived, both scientifically and non-scientifically.

Quote: Gandler

How is science not credible? By definition science is self-correcting. Science is the most credible way of looking at anything.

I'll post some examples in the next few days.


My understanding is it's similar to religion and the Catholic Church.

When a person considers becoming a Catholic, the church doesn't disclose all the wrongdoings they're responsible for.

They hide those.

They have no proof of what they're selling and they're biased when they do sell.

Yet, there are billions of members.


Here's a simple example, prove a virus exists.

But it can be anything.


Now, scientists might demand proof of religion.

But we don't demand proof of science.

We accept it, since our life might depend on it.

Science and religion are similar.


Is science a religion or cult?

Possibly.

Quote: ams288

I’m starting to think he is a poorly coded AI program.

The issue with AI bots are the programmers don't know how to model a human spirit.

Therefore, they are hype, but excellent to control the masses.