The Coronavirus thread

The full of picture of this heart doctor.

Aseem Malhotra is a British cardiologist,[1] public health campaigner,[2] author, and advocate against the use of COVID vaccines.[3] He campaigns for people to reduce sugar in their diet,[4] promotes a low-carb and high-fat diet,[5] and encourages the reduction of medical overprescribing.[6] He was the first science director of Action on Sugar in 2014.[7] He was listed as one of The Sunday Times 500 most influential people in 2016[4] and was twice recognized as one of the top fifty black and minority ethnic community member pioneers in the UK's National Health Service by the Health Service Journal.[8][6] Malhotra is co-author of a book called The Pioppi Diet.[9]
His views on diet and health have been criticized by the British Heart Foundation as "misleading and wrong", and his public questioning of the need ever to use statins has been condemned as a danger to public health.[10] His "Pioppi diet" was named by the British Dietetic Association as one of the "top 5 worst celeb diets to avoid in 2018".[5] During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malhotra published a book called The 21-Day Immunity Plan,[11] which claims that following the diet can quickly help people reduce their risk from the virus; such claims are not backed by medical research evidence.[1] Despite initially campaigning for the COVID vaccine,[12] he later campaigned against the use of COVID mRNA vaccines[13] contrary to the available evidence.[14]

I'm not sure of the article date (2022?).

There are blood donation centers only for non-vaccinated blood because the demand could be so high.

Some call the blood, pure blood and the non-pure blood, tainted blood.

--------------------------------------------------

Unvaccinated blood is now in very high demand
.
.
.
Embalmers Find Unusual Clots in Veins Post-Shots

Richard Hirschman, a board-certified embalmer and funeral director with more than 20 years of experience, has come forward stating that, in the time period since COVID-19 shots were rolled out, starting around the middle of 2021, he's been finding "strange clots" in the bodies of the deceased.

"When I do the embalming, I have to go into the vein. And in order for the embalming process, I have to allow blood to be drained. So I actually pulled this huge, long clot — fibrous looking clot — out prior to an embalming," Hirschman said.

The beginning of the clot, which resembles a white, rubbery worm, appears red and like a normal clot. But the majority of the clot is different: It's composed of a white, fibrous material. "It just isn't normal," he said, adding:

"Typically, a blood clot is smooth; it's blood that has coagulated together. But when you squeeze it, or touch it or try to pick it up, it generally falls apart … you can almost squeeze it between your fingers and get it back to blood again. But this white fibrous stuff is pretty strong. It's not weak at all. You can manipulate it, it's very pliable. It's not hard … it is not normal. I don't know how anybody can live with something like this inside of them."

What's important to note is embalmers have reported finding unusual clots not only in deceased people who've received the shots but also in those who have had a blood transfusion. So while we don't know what risk there is from receiving blood from someone who's had COVID-19 shots, "the risk is not zero," Kirsch said.

Another case involves a baby, Alexander, who received a vaccinated blood transfusion and developed "an enormous clot that eventually stretched from his left knee, all the way to his heart," and died. According to Kirsch, the hospital then went on to delete all related medical records:

"Sacred Heart Hospital in Washington State has erased all records of the death of baby Alex who died from a blood clot after receiving a transfusion from a vaccinated patient. So there is no evidence of a problem anymore. They erased it, just like the CDC erased all data linking vaccines and autism. This is how science works nowadays."

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/human-rights/unvaccinated-blood-is-now-in-very-high-demand/

----------------------------------------------

Quote: rxwine

The full of picture of this heart doctor.

Aseem Malhotra is a British cardiologist,[1] public health campaigner,[2] author, and advocate against the use of COVID vaccines.[3] He campaigns for people to reduce sugar in their diet,[4] promotes a low-carb and high-fat diet,[5] and encourages the reduction of medical overprescribing.[6] He was the first science director of Action on Sugar in 2014.[7] He was listed as one of The Sunday Times 500 most influential people in 2016[4] and was twice recognized as one of the top fifty black and minority ethnic community member pioneers in the UK's National Health Service by the Health Service Journal.[8][6] Malhotra is co-author of a book called The Pioppi Diet.[9]
His views on diet and health have been criticized by the British Heart Foundation as "misleading and wrong", and his public questioning of the need ever to use statins has been condemned as a danger to public health.[10] His "Pioppi diet" was named by the British Dietetic Association as one of the "top 5 worst celeb diets to avoid in 2018".[5] During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malhotra published a book called The 21-Day Immunity Plan,[11] which claims that following the diet can quickly help people reduce their risk from the virus; such claims are not backed by medical research evidence.[1] Despite initially campaigning for the COVID vaccine,[12] he later campaigned against the use of COVID mRNA vaccines[13] contrary to the available evidence.[14]

Here are his recent peer reviewed papers regarding disinformation and vaccines.

There are two parts, both in pdf and published 9/26/2022:

---------------------------------------------------------

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1

https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/224

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 2

https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/72/228

-----------------------------------------------------------

Quote: DoubleGold

I wouldn't touch it.

In the non-virtual world, there are likely men not vaccinated receiving $1M a pop.

Of course handsome, knows 5 languages, well built, etc.

But for a vaccinated man, probably just the going rate ($100?).

I was wondering how they could verify whether or not the sperm was indeed unvaxxed.

Quote: ams288

I was wondering how they could verify whether or not the sperm was indeed unvaxxed.

There is likely a signature in the blood.

So this is the group that tried to discredit a famous heart doctor that was for Covid vaccines and now against after his father died.



What would we rather do?

Test a product on animals (in this case, dogs)

OR

Test a product on humans


Either way seems cruel.

I'd want a placebo.

-----------------------------------------------

British Heart Foundation
.
.
.
In June 2011, the British Heart Foundation was one of several health charities, alongside Cancer Research UK, the Alzheimer's Society and Parkinson's UK, targeted by animal rights pressure group Animal Aid, in a series of newspaper advertisements urging the public not to donate to the organizations under the pretence of funding experiments on animals. The pressure group argued that 100 dogs had died since 1988 during the experiments.

The BHF has responded to these criticisms by saying the charity only funds animal research after grant applications have gone through an independent peer review process and follows the three Rs principles when considering such grants.
.
.
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Heart_Foundation

------------------------------------------------

Spreading doubt about whether we landed on the moon is one thing, but spreading doubt about medical treatments can get people killed.

Quote: rxwine

Spreading doubt about whether we landed on the moon is one thing, but spreading doubt about medical treatments can get people killed.

Especially spreading misinformation that vaccinations are safe.

Quote: DoubleGold

Especially spreading misinformation that vaccinations are safe.

The internet is full of people like you picking nits with all kinds of mainstream information. Few of them aren’t frauds or crackpots. It’s not looking good for you.

The propensity of data may change the overall assessment of the vaccine efficacy.

From Dr. Aseem Malhotra's paper referred to above (see below).

I think it's obvious the vaccine is doing more harm than good.

But I see reports of folks dropping like flies (especially young athletes) all of the sudden with no explanation of death.

Hence, the term "all-cause mortality" is used below.

------------------------------------------------------

Published: 26 Sept. 2022

Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 1
.
.
.
Is the vaccine doing more harm than good?

The most objective determinant of whether the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the harms is by analysing its effects on ‘all-cause mortality’. This gets round the thorny issue as to what should be classified as a COVID-19 death, and also takes full account of any negative effects of the vaccine. It would be surprising – to say the least – if during an apparently deadly pandemic, an effective vaccine could not clearly and unequivocally be shown to reduce all-cause mortality.

Pfizer’s pivotal mRNA trial in adults did not show any statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality, and in absolute terms there were actually slightly more deaths in the treatment arm versus in the placebo.

Work by Fenton et al. showed an unusual spike in mortality in each age group of the unvaccinated population, which coincides with the vaccine roll-out for each age group. The rapid shrinking in the size of this population means a small-time lag could theoretically produce this effect artifactually. Alternative explanations must include the (more likely) possibility that a rise in mortality after vaccination was misattributed to the unvaccinated population: in other words, those counted as ‘unvaccinated deaths’ would in fact be those who had died within 14 days of being vaccinated (a freedom of information [FOI] request has now confirmed that authorities in Sweden were indeed categorising deaths within 14 days of dosing as unvaccinated, creating a misleading picture of efficacy vs death).

One has to raise the possibility that the excess cardiac arrests and continuing pressures on hospitals in 2021/2022 from non-COVID-19 admissions may all be signalling a non-COVID-19 health crisis exacerbated by interventions, which would of course also include lockdowns and/or vaccines.

Given these observations, and reappraisal of the randomised controlled trial data of mRNA products, it seems difficult to argue that the vaccine roll-out has been net beneficial in all age groups. While a case can be made that the vaccines may have saved some lives in the elderly or otherwise vulnerable groups, that case seems tenuous at best in other sections of the population, and when the possible short-, medium- and unknown longer-term harms are considered (especially for multiple injections, robust safety data for which simply does not exist), the roll-out into the entire population seems, at best, a reckless gamble. It’s important to acknowledge that the risks of adverse events from the vaccine remain constant, whereas the benefits reduce over time, as new variants are (1) less virulent and (2) not targeted by an outdated product. Having appraised the data, it remains a real possibility that my father’s sudden cardiac death was related to the vaccine. A pause and reappraisal of vaccination Policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.
.
.
.
https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/71/221

----------------------------------------------