internet porn in South Carolina

Page 3 of 6<123456>
December 22nd, 2016 at 8:43:03 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25010
Do you know there are people hooked on
eating corn starch? Should we ban it?
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
December 23rd, 2016 at 2:55:52 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18136
Quote: pew
Porn can be a huge problem for many people. The government is not the solution as always.


Beyond keeping kiddie porn and other clear problems illegal no, it is not. A better way is indirect education. Same as the Ad Council made littering socially unacceptable during the 1970s. But even that is done incorrect.

IMHO all the "education" about porn is used the wrong way. Most focus is on the girls being "exploited." Watch "Hot Girls Wanted" and you will not feel sorry for them again. They come from all over, looking for easy money and to be the next Marilyn Chambers. They think it is neat somehow. Figuring letting a guy have their way on camera at a price they negotiate is better than waiting tables all week. On one level I have to admire them. Would I want to date them? Hell no. But if they can make some fast cash and do right with it, free country. Of course I am not talking about torture porn or other crazy stuff where they may be forced.

No, the focus needs to be on the customers. Pre-1980s porn was seedy. You had to go to a bad shop in a cluster of bad shops. It was a little unspoken thing where the city allowed it to cluster to avoid it being all over. And every now and again shop owners had to take a pinch. Lots of guys just didn't want to be around that. Now it is private and hidden, so the addiction thing is easier.

If you are a guy what are you more likely to respond to? Probably willing females stories or how it will affect your own performance? Need a modern version of the Crying Indian (who was not even an Indian) or need storylines in TV and movies showing the guy having his life destroyed.

Only then will consumption moderate. It will still be there, but when you make it look unmanly to sit at your screen looking at porn all night then maybe. Men are not as affected by this kind of campaign as women, however.
The President is a fink.
December 23rd, 2016 at 12:02:17 PM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25010
The biggest boost to porn is now the
most drop dead beautiful young women
on the planet think it's fine to make a sex
video. Before the internet most porn
women were average looking with a
ton of makeup. Now you find jaw
dropping gorgeous women wherever
you look. Women you would never have
a chance with unless you were rich
and famous. Porn is a great deal of
fun now, it used to be sleazy and murky
and shrouded in guilt.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
December 23rd, 2016 at 12:24:52 PM permalink
rxwine
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 188
Posts: 18631
Quote: Evenbob
Porn is a great deal of
fun now, it used to be sleazy and murky
and shrouded in guilt.


Old porn used to "loop" a lot. They would make a scene last many times longer by looping the same scene. Sometimes they would use a different camera, but it was usually obvious. Always found that annoying.
You believe in an invisible god, and dismiss people who say they are trans? Really?
December 23rd, 2016 at 2:30:27 PM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
Soft porn is the biggest money maker today and most soft porn is female produced and female directed.

Looping was used in some Hollywood mainstream movies too . Also wholesale scene cutting and insertion.
August 30th, 2019 at 12:24:18 AM permalink
Evenbob
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 146
Posts: 25010
Quote: Evenbob
The biggest boost to porn is now the
most drop dead beautiful young women
on the planet think it's fine to make a sex
video. Before the internet most porn
women were average looking with a
ton of makeup. Now you find jaw
dropping gorgeous women wherever
you look. .


Was reading an article about this,
how there has been a seismic
shift in attitude about porn. It
was pure evil when I was a kid,
if you found some it was filth
you were looking at, it came
with a certain amount of guilt.

Things have changed. People
under 30 have been exposed
to porn most of their lives
because of the internet. Many
learned what sex was watching
porn. It's no longer has the
stigma attached to it that it
did just a couple generations
ago.

Amateur porn, college girls
and the like, often do it just
for fun and feel no guilt at
all. They feel proud showing
off their bodies, We're on a
road to a future that our
grandparents couldn't possibly
understand. That no church or
gov't can control. A world where
we finally do away with sexual
guilt for good. It will certainly
be a massive improvement
over what has been foisted
on us for the last 1000 years
by organized religion.

In 1951 the word 'pregnant'
couldn't be used on I Love Lucy,
the Catholic censors said it
might make viewers think
about the sexual act that
got Lucy in that condition.
Pure insanity.
If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose.
August 30th, 2019 at 2:13:16 AM permalink
AZDuffman
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 135
Posts: 18136
Quote: Evenbob
Was reading an article about this,
how there has been a seismic
shift in attitude about porn. It
was pure evil when I was a kid,
if you found some it was filth
you were looking at, it came
with a certain amount of guilt.

Things have changed. People
under 30 have been exposed
to porn most of their lives
because of the internet. Many
learned what sex was watching
porn. It's no longer has the
stigma attached to it that it
did just a couple generations
ago.

Amateur porn, college girls
and the like, often do it just
for fun and feel no guilt at
all. They feel proud showing
off their bodies, We're on a
road to a future that our
grandparents couldn't possibly
understand. That no church or
gov't can control. A world where
we finally do away with sexual
guilt for good. It will certainly
be a massive improvement
over what has been foisted
on us for the last 1000 years
by organized religion.

In 1951 the word 'pregnant'
couldn't be used on I Love Lucy,
the Catholic censors said it
might make viewers think
about the sexual act that
got Lucy in that condition.
Pure insanity.


Be very careful what you wish for.
The President is a fink.
August 30th, 2019 at 4:49:10 AM permalink
DRich
Member since: Oct 24, 2012
Threads: 51
Posts: 4942
It is impossible to raise children today without them having access to porn. It is always available and you can't possibly block it everywhere.
At my age a Life In Prison sentence is not much of a detrrent.
August 30th, 2019 at 5:10:09 AM permalink
Fleastiff
Member since: Oct 27, 2012
Threads: 62
Posts: 7831
I wouldn't call it 'porn', but think of Ariana Grande, her prime market is young females and her signature song, icicles, is hardly fit for twelve year old girls yet the mothers who drive their daughters to the concerts do not know it is a sexually explicit term. The girls know either from conversation or from experience but the generation gap is a barrier.

porn is so common that non-pornographic sexual depictions are being produced.
August 30th, 2019 at 6:09:36 AM permalink
gamerfreak
Member since: Feb 19, 2018
Threads: 4
Posts: 527
Quote: reno
Liberal Democrat politicians love trying to ban and/or tax things which are bad for the body (for example: cigarettes, sugary soft drinks, guns) while conservative Republican politicians love trying to ban and/or tax things which are bad for the soul (for example: blowjobs).

Republican politicians in South Carolina have a new idea to protect the soul: mandate that all computer manufacturers & retailers install software to block pornography. And don't worry, they'll tax you and the computer manufacturer if you opt out.

Quote: Reuters
Buyers over 18 in South Carolina would have to pay a $20 fee to have the block removed. Manufacturers or sellers would pay a $20 opt-out fee for each computer or device sold so they didn't have to install the blocking software, according to the proposed measure.... The amendment corresponds with the Republican Party's national platform that calls for states to get tough on pornography, adding that the internet has become a safe haven for predators.


These anti-tax Republicans insist they're not raising taxes. (It's a "$20 fee" not a "$20 tax.") "This is a way to preserve freedom, not raise taxes and combat a serious problem all in one," State Representative William "Bill" Chumley, a Republican, said in an interview.

I think these guys are smart enough to know this plan has too many holes in it (Constitutional and/or technological) to work as intended, they're just pandering to the easily duped devout evangelical crowd.

But it sets an interesting precedent: if South Carolina can do it to porn websites, couldn't California do it to gun websites?

Banning sex acts and porn. Typical big government conservatives. There are countless examples of this, like Ted Cruz tried to bad sex toys in Texas.. They always want to invoke the sanctity of the constitution when it comes to gun rights, but absolutely might as well wipe their a$$ with it when it comes to social issues. Republican politicians have never wanted small government, that narrative is a complete lie to appeal to the libertarian crowd.

And FWIW liberal politicians who are anti-gun or try to ban/tax vices are no better.
Page 3 of 6<123456>