Textual analysis of Old Testament
October 21st, 2016 at 9:58:57 AM permalink | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 | Father I did study some bible in college, and they used to bring up textual questions. For example the following story is told twice in 2nd Samuel and 1 Chronicle. But the obvious difference is in verse #1. Who started the problem (The Lord or Satan)? Doesn't the punishment seem severe for doing a census? In the modern day the government constantly does census.
|
October 21st, 2016 at 10:45:06 AM permalink | |
Fleastiff Member since: Oct 27, 2012 Threads: 62 Posts: 7831 | I would not know about any of this stuff, but since the first two parts seem to be dealing with causation and geographical range it is obvious that there are two separate authors from two different areas. Causation in warfare preparation usually depends upon who the victor is. If but a census, then it is simply the difference between counting and being counted. It seems the purpose was to determine the total number of potential soldiers and the financial resources for waging war. |
October 21st, 2016 at 11:39:01 AM permalink | |
Pacomartin Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 1068 Posts: 12569 |
I think so, but it seems to have displeased God because it meant that King David was trusting in his resources to go to battle instead of in God. But the punishment is terrible (there died seventy thousand men from the three day pestilence) for what in modern times would just be considered being a good general. |
October 21st, 2016 at 1:22:07 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
Typical for god people. Don't trust science, don't trust math or what you actually see, trust a god who isn't there. In other words, just trust dumb luck. To keep their power the religious leaders had to constantly fight against science and reason. Keeping the people dumb and ignorant was the best way to do that. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 21st, 2016 at 2:01:27 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
You are right in that David was warned many times by God and even his trusted servant Joab not to take the census and rather to trust in the Word of the Lord. I agree the punishment is terrible. It is obvious that this is not taking place in our days today and we have to be careful not to read such things in the light of our own day. The revelation of Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of God's pedagogy of bringing a violent and brutal culture to see its ugliness and to trust in the Lord who alone will bring the peace we desire. Seen now in this light it is indeed a harsh penalty. You will notice that there is in the midst of the story a foreshadowing of the mercy of God who stays the Angel's hand before the full brunt of the pestilence falls. It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures. ( |
October 21st, 2016 at 2:05:07 PM permalink | |
Fleastiff Member since: Oct 27, 2012 Threads: 62 Posts: 7831 |
Shades of the first Chinese Dynasty. The peasant who stated the flood was the result of a rock slide not the anger of the Gods, organized work parties not pray vigils and sacrifices. |
October 21st, 2016 at 2:35:32 PM permalink | |
Evenbob Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 146 Posts: 25013 |
A real god would have no reason to do that. The priests of a fake god would have a reason. Science takes away their power and diminishes them. It was that way until a couple thousand years later when the god people were forced kicking and screaming to accept science as a better way of doing things. And the old priests in the Bible were correct, once science was let in, the power of god has been diminished to the point that he's just an afterthought to most people now. It's impossible for both science and superstition to flourish at the same time. Superstition must kill science if it wants to survive. Science kills superstition by just quietly doing it's thing. And the Church is pure superstition from it's head to it's tail. If you take a risk, you may lose. If you never take a risk, you will always lose. |
October 21st, 2016 at 2:42:23 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
I wonder how often the Greek gods threatened their subjects not to piss them off. It's clear with stories like these that Jehovah was meant as deity to be feared. we know from stories like job that he's not to be questioned, either. It's times like these, when this is put on display, that I'm so glad it's all a bunch of myths. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |
October 21st, 2016 at 3:39:54 PM permalink | |
FrGamble Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 67 Posts: 7596 |
I wouldn't say feared, but there is a slow but important movement from fear to trust to loving relationship. The Old Testament is like the fall in the garden in reverse. It all begins in a loving relationship built on trust and then it moves to Adam and Eve fearing God and viewing Him as competition. It takes a long time to move people from fear to trust and finally to love. An example of this is Evenbob continuing to think science and God are in competition. We need not fear that God is somehow going to go against our reason or ask us to go against nature. God who created the laws that govern the physical universe and gave us a brain with consciousness, freedom, and intelligence to explore the world and do science is best understood when faith in Him and Scientific study go hand in hand. This is not to say faith and science are the same and equally important. After all science is limited to our observations and experiments. Science gives us the data that faith, wisdom, and reason extrapolate from and act upon. It is with the smallest brushes that the artist paints the most exquisitely beautiful pictures. ( |
October 21st, 2016 at 4:47:54 PM permalink | |
Nareed Member since: Oct 24, 2012 Threads: 346 Posts: 12545 |
You have a vested interest against saying so.
Let's see: Adam and Eve disobey Jehovah, he kicks them out of the house and gives them an awful existence The builders at Babel frighten a dim-witted Jehovah who seems to think a bunch of primitives using mud brick can build a tower to reach the sky. He messes with their minds and scatters them all over the world. Humanity displeases Jehovah, he drowns them all and all the animals on Earth. Genocide doesn't get more complete than this. Satan proposes a bet, Jehovah takes it, Job and his family suffer horribly. When Job dares question the high and mighty, he gets a mean-spirited tongue-lashing. Do I go on? Do I need to go on? Anyone with half a working brain would be terrified of this monster. This, BTW, is expected. The gods tend to be terrifying in many of their interactions with mortals. they are modeled on natural forces, after all, and these are scary, capricious, undependable things. And when they go bad, they go really bad. Storms, earthquakes, lightning, volcanoes, disease and the like are destructive. they kill people. Epidemics were horribly common in ancient times, Medieval times, the Dark Ages, the Renaissance and modern times right up to widespread vaccination and modern notions of hygiene. Again, why would the Hebrew god be any different? Or the Christian god later on? You can wax poetic about Jesus (and I still don't see how salvation is anything other than a scam writ large) and forgiveness all you want, but that doesn't do away with Hell.
Oh, there is no competition. Donald Trump is a one-term LOSER |